news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

"Important notice! The 87 foreclosed properties of Li Mei in Hefei have been put up for auction." On August 24, such a piece of news attracted attention in the real estate agency group.

The above 87 houses are listed on JD.com’s judicial auction platform and are currently in the “preview” status. The auction will officially start at 10:00 on September 29.

According to Xiaoxiang Morning News, Mr. Peng, a foreclosure real estate agent in Changsha, said:These houses were put online on August 24."Because it was just put up, no one has asked about it yet. They are all listed on JD.com, 87 apartments, 5 communities. 20 apartments in Banshan No. 1 Jilianyuan (unfinished), 15 apartments in Huihuang International City (unfinished), 30 apartments in Fuxing Jiacheng (some with rental decoration), 7 apartments in Caizi Jiadu (unfinished), and 15 apartments in Zhonghang City (unfinished). "

Mr. Peng believes thatThe starting prices are all market prices, there is no price advantage"For out-of-town courts, there are many houses available, so it is highly likely that they will not organize a unified inspection. You can go to the community to study it in advance."

The public execution order disclosed the details of 87 properties. The owner of the auction items is Mr. Li. Currently, the homepage of the above-mentioned houses to be auctioned has a real-life video of the house attached.

Jingdong judicial auction page shows:

Fuxing Jiacheng in Tianxin District has 30 lots, with starting prices ranging from more than 780,000 yuan to more than 830,000 yuan;

There are 7 lots in Yuhua District’s Caizi Jiadu, with starting prices ranging from more than 740,000 yuan to more than 780,000 yuan;

There are 15 lots in Huihuang City, Furong District, with starting prices ranging from more than 920,000 yuan to more than 1.21 million yuan;

There are 15 lots in Zhonghang City, Yuhua District, with starting prices ranging from more than 640,000 yuan to more than 680,000 yuan;

There are 20 lots to be auctioned at Banshan No. 1 in Yuhua District, with starting prices ranging from more than 1.02 million yuan to more than 1.33 million yuan.

The auction company staff said:Most of the houses to be auctioned are rough。

As early as March 14, there was news on the Internet that 87 houses in Changsha owned by Hefei woman Li Mei were sealed, which caused heated discussions. Video screenshots showed that the door of the house was sealed by the Intermediate People's Court of Hefei City, Anhui Province, and there was a notice of sealing, auctioning (selling) property, and moving out within a time limit.

Photo/Xiaoxiang Morning News

The announcement shows that the Hefei Intermediate Court is executing the defendant Ling Zheng.Fund-raising fraudAnd Li Mei and othersCrime of illegally absorbing public depositsIn a criminal judgment involving confiscation of all personal property, recovery of illegal gains and ordering repayment, given that the defendants Ling Zheng and Li Mei have not yet fulfilled the obligations stipulated in the effective legal documents, after investigation, the public security organs and the Hefei Intermediate People's Court pre-sealed 87 properties in Changsha under the name of the defendant Li Mei, and attached a list of the 87 properties.

Who is Li Mei?

According to a 2019 report by Hunan Daily, since the second half of 2016,A large number of investors from Hefei entered ChangshaThere was no purchase restriction at that time, and this phenomenon continued until 2018 when Changsha introduced the strictest "6.25" new real estate policy in history.

A notice from the Hefei police showed that the two main culprits in the Dazhi Group’s illegal fund-raising case should be considered speculators of the “Hefei real estate speculation group”.87 properties in Changsha and 90 properties in Hefei owned by the two were seized.

According to a report on the official Weibo account of Luyang Branch of Hefei Public Security Bureau on November 7, 2018, 177 properties of Ling and Li, the actual controllers of Dazhi Investment Group Co., Ltd., were seized, including 87 properties in Changsha with a total area of ​​8,550.57 square meters; and 90 properties in Hefei with a total area of ​​35,507.37 square meters.

Tianyancha shows that the legal representative and largest shareholder of Dazhi Investment Group Co., Ltd. is Ling Zheng. Among Ling Zheng's partners is Li Mei, and the two have cooperated in many companies.

In Anhui Dazhi Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., where Ling Zheng serves as the legal representative and senior executive, Li Mei is the largest shareholder, holding 80% of the shares.

On February 4, the official website of the Hefei Intermediate People's Court published an announcement on the payment of funds in the case in which Ling Zheng committed fund-raising fraud and Li Mei and others committed illegal absorption of public deposits (the "Dazhi" case), and the first payment of the collected funds involved in the case will be made.

Highly alert: Four major "minefields" in judicial auction houses

A few days ago, the official website of the Supreme People's Procuratorate announced that the procuratorate had discovered that there are "minefields" in some current judicial house auction activities, which require high vigilance and precautions in advance.

1. Bidders maliciously collude and bid at low prices, disrupting the order of judicial auctions.Some bidders maliciously collude with others in order to win the auction house at a lower price, thereby damaging the interests of the property owner or other bidders.

2. The person subject to execution fabricated a lease relationship to obstruct the auction in order to evade debt.In recent years, some persons subject to execution have taken advantage of the "sale does not break the lease" system in order to evade debts and hinder execution. They have maliciously colluded with others to fabricate false leasing relationships through backdated contracts, mixed payments, false litigation, etc., agreed to longer lease terms and collected rent in advance, thereby hindering the normal progress of house auctions.

3. Unclear tax amounts can easily lead to disputes.Article 30 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning Online Judicial Auctions by People's Courts provides that: "Taxes and fees generated by online judicial auctions themselves shall be borne by the relevant entities in accordance with the provisions of relevant laws and administrative regulations; if there are no provisions or the provisions are unclear, the people's court may determine the relevant entities and amounts borne by the taxes and fees based on legal principles and the actual circumstances of the case."

In practice, some courts remind buyers in advance that "all taxes and fees shall be borne by the buyer", while others mark "for the relevant taxes and fees involved in the transfer, please consult with the relevant functional departments for confirmation". Some bidders did not learn in detail about the taxes and fees and burdens of the houses involved before the auction, and regretted facing the unexpected taxes and fees after the auction, which led to unnecessary disputes.

4. The difficulty in vacating the houses involved in the case affects the buyer’s use of the houses.In December 2019, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Opinions on Further Strengthening the Concept of Good Faith and Civilized Execution in Enforcement Work", which clearly stated that if the auctioned property is immovable and the person subject to enforcement or other persons have no right to occupy it, the people's court shall be responsible for vacating it in accordance with the law, and shall not state in the public information that "it is not responsible for vacating and delivering" and other information. In December 2021, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Opinions on Further Improving the Enforcement Power Restraint Mechanism and Strengthening Enforcement Supervision", reiterating this requirement.

However, in judicial practice, the courts face many difficulties in vacating houses in accordance with the law and regulations, and sometimes bidders have to postpone the acceptance of the house.

In conjunction with supervision and case handling, the procuratorate reminds: When participating in the bidding for judicial auction houses, one should understand the relevant processes and procedures in advance, read the public information in detail, and be fully aware of the various risks that exist in the house, and participate in the bidding on the premise of rational budgeting, knowing the risks, and understanding the rules.