news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

Regarding the hotly debated collision test between Xiaomi SU7 and Zeekr 007, Xiaomi Motors responded in the Xiaomi SU7 Answers to Netizens’ Questions (Episode 67) released on the evening of August 14. After analysis, it was found that this so-called “test” wasThe settings are not rigorous, the records are incomplete, and the conclusions are unscientific.At the same time, Xiaomi Auto denied and explained some of the claims made in the test.

Recently, a car blogger with millions of followers released a video titled "When Xiaomi SU7 hits a Zeekr 007", which attracted widespread attention. The video shows that the blogger used Xiaomi SU7 to conduct a collision test with a Zeekr 007, with a collision speed of 60 kilometers per hour and a 90% overlap rate. As a result, the Xiaomi SU7 suffered a small battery power outage and the car door could not be opened.

Xiaomi Motors conducted a preliminary analysis of the incident. Xiaomi Motors said that the statement that the E-CALL (automatic emergency call system) failed after the collision was untrue. "After investigation, the call center called and connected immediately after the collision, and the backend continued to call for 5 minutes without receiving any feedback; and then called back the car owner's registered mobile phone number a total of 5 times, but no one answered." Xiaomi Motors explained.

Secondly, regarding the information related to "small battery power failure" that netizens are concerned about, Xiaomi Motors said that according to the data from the national monitoring platform, the vehicle data was offline for a long time before the collision, and the small battery was disconnected for a long time; then, the small battery was connected again. At the time of the collision, the data from the national monitoring platform was missing, and the small battery was already in a power-off state. "We cannot confirm whether the electrodes were locked in accordance with the standard when the small battery was powered on again during this process, nor can we rule out the possibility that the small battery was powered off after the collision due to improper assembly." Xiaomi Motors said.

Xiaomi Auto emphasized that Xiaomi SU7 had undergone rigorous collision tests during the development process and had no safety hazards, and the problems described in the video did not occur.

Finally, Xiaomi Auto calls for vehicle impact testing to be a complex, rigorous and extremely serious test, which should be conducted by professional organizations.

On the evening of August 14, test blogger @原始是翔翔啊 also released an apology video, explaining the "Xiaomi SU7 and Zeekr 007 collision test video" that had previously caused controversy.

The blogger said: In the previously released video "When Xiaomi SU7 hits a Zeekr 007...", we reflected and reviewed all the issues reported by netizens one by one, and spent the past day finding another Xiaomi SU7 to verify. We found that there may be a problem with the positive power cord being not installed tightly. Since we have no way to verify the actual tightening torque, the statement that the positive power cord of the battery was knocked off is inaccurate, and this statement will affect the subsequent conclusions and judgments, causing the content to cause confusion and misleading to the audience. Hereby solemnly apologize to Xiaomi Auto and all the friends who have watched this issue before.

Industry insiders said that due to the structural design of different vehicles, different models may have different "crash-resistant" points. At the same time, in reality, the collision angle of vehicles and the collision cannot overlap, so such a "car-to-car" collision cannot fully explain the absolute strength of the two cars. If you want to understand the safety of the model you bought, you can refer to the collision test results of official organizations.

reporter| Li Xing

Editor|Cheng Peng, Sun Lei, Gai Yuanyuan

Proofreading|He Xiaotao

Cover image source: Screenshot

｜Original article from nbdnews, Daily Economic News｜

Reproduction, excerpting, copying and mirroring are prohibited without permission