news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

In last night's FA Cup quarter-finals, Beijing Guoan challenged Shanghai Shenhua away. This game was not only a clash of skills and tactics between the two teams, but also a test of the fairness of the referee's penalty. In particular, the controversial handball penalty in the second half not only made the game itself full of drama, but also triggered heated discussions in all walks of life about the understanding and implementation of football rules after the game.

In the 50th minute of the game, Beijing Guoan striker Fabio Abreu broke into the Shanghai Shenhua penalty area during an attack, trying to find a good chance to score. In the fierce physical confrontation, Fabio accidentally fell to the ground, and at the same time, the ball seemed to be rolling near him. At this moment, the referee responded quickly and decided to use the video assistant referee (VAR) system to assist in determining whether there was a foul. After repeated replays and reviews by VAR, the referee finally determined that Fabio had committed a handball foul while falling to the ground, and therefore rejected Guoan's penalty application.

Faced with this decision, Beijing Guoan officials expressed strong dissatisfaction and doubts through social media immediately after the game. They publicly questioned that there was no clear evidence in the VAR replay and broadcast footage that the ball did hit Fabio's hand, and this statement quickly sparked heated discussions on the Internet.

The question raised by Guoan officials is actually an open questioning of the fairness of refereeing in football matches, and a profound reflection on the accuracy and transparency of VAR technology in practical applications. From the perspective of rules, the determination of handball fouls does rely on the referee's visual judgment and VAR's auxiliary verification. However, the complexity and high speed of football matches determine that even the most advanced technological means may have certain limitations due to factors such as angle and light.

In this case, if VAR fails to capture the decisive scene, the referee's decision will become the target of public criticism. But we must realize that referees are also human beings, and they are also affected by various factors, including visual illusions, game pressure, etc. Therefore, for any penalty, we should remain rational and respect the referee's professional judgment. At the same time, we should also call for further improvement of VAR technology to improve the accuracy and fairness of penalties.

The question raised by Guoan officials has touched a sensitive nerve in the hearts of fans to a certain extent - "Guoan is always the one that gets hurt, has it been taken care of again?" Behind this question, it reflects the long-standing trust crisis in Chinese football. In the long history of professional leagues, there are many disputes caused by referee penalties, which are often accompanied by doubts about the fairness of the referee and even the entire league environment. However, we must recognize that any penalty is an independent event and should not be simply attributed to "care" or "suppression". The essence of a football game is competition, a contest of skills and tactics between athletes, rather than a game of off-field factors.