news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

According to the Bianniu News on August 15, Xiaomi Motors released SU7’s answers to netizens’ questions (Episode 67) last night, responding to the collision test between Xiaomi SU7 and Zeekr 007. Xiaomi Motors stated that after analysis, it believed that this so-called "test" was not rigorously set up, the records were incomplete, and the conclusions were untrue.

First, the statement that "the E-CALL (automatic emergency call system) failed after the collision" in the relevant test is untrue. After investigation, the call center called and answered the call immediately after the collision, and the backend called continuously for 5 minutes without receiving any feedback; and then called back the car owner's registered mobile phone number a total of 5 times, but no one answered.

Second, regarding the "small battery power failure" that netizens are concerned about, according to the data from the national monitoring platform: the vehicle data was offline for a long time before the collision, and the small battery was disconnected for a long time; then, the small battery was connected again. At the time of the collision, the data from the national monitoring platform was missing, and the small battery was already in a power-off state. We cannot confirm whether the electrodes were locked in accordance with the standard when the small battery was powered on again during this process, nor can we rule out the possibility that the small battery was powered off after the collision due to improper assembly.

Third, Xiaomi SU7 has undergone rigorous collision tests during the development process, and there are no safety hazards, and the problems described in the video did not occur.

First, the statement that "the E-CALL (automatic emergency call system) failed after the collision" in the relevant test is untrue. After investigation, the call center called and answered the call immediately after the collision, and the backend called continuously for 5 minutes without receiving any feedback; and then called back the car owner's registered mobile phone number a total of 5 times, but no one answered.

Second, regarding the "small battery power failure" that netizens are concerned about, according to the data from the national monitoring platform: the vehicle data was offline for a long time before the collision, and the small battery was disconnected for a long time; then, the small battery was connected again. At the time of the collision, the data from the national monitoring platform was missing, and the small battery was already in a power-off state. We cannot confirm whether the electrodes were locked in accordance with the standard when the small battery was powered on again during this process, nor can we rule out the possibility that the small battery was powered off after the collision due to improper assembly.