2024-08-08
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
Recently, a netizen revealed that 110, 119, and 120 were all in place, and three people were about to jump off the building together!
According to the netizen, the incident happened on August 7 in a factory building in Shenzhen, when three men agreed to jump off the building together.
After receiving the alarm, 110, 119, and 120 arrived in time, cordoned off the scene, set up an air cushion, stabilized the emotions of the person who was about to jump from the building, and sent people to negotiate.
According to the pictures from the scene, the three men are now on the outer surface of the awning on the second floor. It is estimated that this floor is 5 meters high and the air mattress is 2 to 3 meters high. A large number of staff gathered at the scene to prepare for rescue. It is understood that the cause of this incident was a wage dispute.
The occurrence of this incident is really regrettable. If the rumor is true, a wage dispute involving employees cost a lot of public resources to handle, should the person in charge of this company be held responsible for this?
At the same time, as the employees involved, in order to demand their wages, they took such an extreme way to attract attention. What is the reason behind this? It is worth reflecting on by the whole society.
Nowadays, all walks of life are affected by the economic downturn. Many companies are facing tremendous operating pressure. Layoffs and salary cuts seem to be the key means to reduce costs and increase efficiency. At the same time, it involves the issue of employee compensation and resettlement. Many companies strictly implement compensation in accordance with the Labor Law during this process, but some companies inevitably have labor disputes with employees.
The emergence of this phenomenon highlights at least several problems. First, many companies in Shenzhen have laid off employees recently. Second, there may be many controversial behaviors in the process of layoffs. Third, employees' awareness of rights protection has increased.
It is undeniable that most foreign companies generally carry out layoffs strictly in accordance with the Labor Law and provide employees with corresponding compensation, or even higher compensation than stipulated in the Labor Law.
However, it cannot be ruled out that some domestic companies use various means to force employees to resign voluntarily in order to reduce compensation costs. What's worse, some companies forcibly dismiss employees and are unwilling to pay any compensation.
Because labor arbitration, court lawsuits and other rights protection procedures take a lot of time, the original active and passive relationship has changed. As a company, there is plenty of time to fight a war of attrition with laid-off employees. As an employee, there is no way to spend money and energy to protect rights for a long time. Therefore, extreme behavior may be triggered.
Moreover, even if the employees succeed in defending their rights after going through untold hardships, the cost of violating the law for the company is very low, even negligible. As a professional, no one is really willing to take the step of defending their rights. Who doesn’t want to part ways amicably?
What do you think about this?