news

there are big differences between chinese and foreign elk tests! 5 150,000-class pure electric suvs challenge international standards

2024-09-13

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

following the release of the first and second stage acceleration and 100 km/h braking results, the second phase of zhidian travel's "china's mainstream new energy cost-effectiveness ranking" - the moose test was also successfully completed.

the moose test originated in europe, and its name comes from the fact that on many european roads, moose often suddenly jump out from the roadside, and cars need to evade them urgently to avoid collisions. it may be easier to understand if we call the moose test an "emergency avoidance test."

the elk test verifies the comprehensive performance of the vehicle chassis, including steering sensitivity, chassis stability, etc. the main factors affecting the elk test results include: vehicle chassis adjustment (tires, chassis structure, etc.) and esp body stability system.

there are many rankings of moose tests on the internet. the moose scores of some models exceed 80 kilometers per hour, almost catching up with the 0-100 acceleration. zhidian mobility implemented the iso3888-2 international standard in this test, where the width of lane a is: vehicle width × 1.1 + 0.25 meters; the width of lane b is: vehicle width + 1 meter; the width of lane c is: 3 meters.

to ensure the fairness of the test, all vehicles were uniformly set to sports mode, with the lowest kinetic energy recovery, and original tires before the test. except for the gac aion y plus 610km intelligent driving lithium iron phosphate edition, which uses a torsion beam non-independent rear suspension, the other four models all use multi-link independent suspension. the spacing between the pile barrels needs to be adjusted according to the width of each vehicle. at the same time, the test must ensure that the two results are similar or the same to be used as the standard result.

the faw-volkswagen id.4 crozz pure enjoyment limited edition performed best in this round of moose test, with the best effective results of the two sets of tests being 66 km/h; ranked second was the geely galaxy e5 530km starship edition, with the best effective results of the two sets of tests being 63 km/h.

byd yuan plus honor edition 510km excellence edition ranked third with a difference of 1km/h; leapmotor c10 smart edition and gac aion y plus 610km intelligent driving lithium iron phosphate edition tied for fourth with an effective score of 61km/h.