news

text | xiaoyin

what is the essence of the problem in the middle east?

should the netanyahu authorities think about this issue?

of course, on the other side, we must also realize that whether it is hezbollah in lebanon or some organizations that are in hot war with israel, they actually have the support of iran behind them. so, what are iran’s demands?

has the war situation in the middle east really changed the way we fight?

on the surface, israeli prime minister netanyahu is still having a meeting in new york. from the hotel, he can remotely command the troops at the front.9moon27japan put the top leaders of hezbollah, including nasrallah, the top leader of lebanese hezbollah, into a pot.

netanyahu authorized israeli air strikes on beirut's southern suburbs from his hotel room in new york

even before that, from the killing of aqil, the important leader of hezbollah in lebanon, to the explosion of hezbollah pagers and walkie-talkies, it seemed thatisraelexistmiddle east：

blow it up however you want,

blow it up whenever you want,

whoever you want to blow up will die...

however, is this really the case? has the style of play really changed?

in xiaoyin’s opinion, not necessarily!

the specific fighting style may change, this is the normal state of war. the logic of war has not changed!

as far as israel is concerned, what is the essential difference between tactics such as detonating pagers and walkie-talkies and the ancient greek trojan horse strategy?

it is nothing more than concealing one's combat resources from the outside world and hiding them in the opponent's territory. then, through precise command, they can be launched simultaneously at a specific time and place. it's just that trojan horses are in the cold weapon age. but trojan horses, pagers, and walkie-talkies were not originally combat materials, but they were used by military personnel.

lebanese hezbollah encounters israeli pager bombing attack  picture: cctv news

in fact, "sun tzu's art of war" in ancient china clearly stated that "war is based on deceit" and "war is based on deceit." israel used pagers and walkie-talkies to create an atmosphere of extreme terror within hezbollah, which indeed caused the eyes of many people to explode - including members of hezbollah and civilians.

look at the death of nasrallah. at the same time, the deputy commander-in-chief of iran's "quds force", general neil foshan, was also killed. this is still the "capture the thief first, capture the king" approach. of course, this is just a quote and does not mean who is the "thief".

to put it bluntly, israel seems to be so capable because it combines these abilities——

super intelligence ability,

super strong technological strength,

super strong execution ability,

to achieve the purpose of taking a preemptive strike and hitting wherever directed.

of course, in xiaoyin's view, israel's super capabilities can be learned from by the armies of all countries around the world, but its "super power" is only in the middle east. compared with the islamic world, comes super strong. this has been confirmed many times in previous middle east wars.

but the question is what is israel’s purpose?

in the middle east, whether it is the arab countries or the more powerful players in the islamic world such as iran, assuming that they cannot defeat israel, does israel intend to gradually encroach on the territory of the islamic world, from the west bank of the palestinian area to the gaza strip, and then to lebanon, syria, or even north to iran?

if israel has such a purpose, morally speaking, it will definitely be unjust and helpless!

in fact, even now, in an occasion like the united nations general assembly, netanyahu should feel the anger against him from many parts of the world.

when netanyahu spoke at the un general assembly, representatives from many countries left the meeting angrily

for example, when netanyahu spoke at the un general assembly, representatives from many countries left the table. i wonder how netanyahu felt when he spoke. did he completely ignore the empty seats?

he warned iran at that time that israeli force could reach any corner of iran. but at this time, the iranian representative seat was empty. in other words, no one in iran paid attention to his remarks.

what's more, such assloveniaprime minister golob,pakistanprime minister shahbaz sharif was so angry that he slammed the table.

golob spoke at the general debate of the un general assembly that day and said that the situation in the middle east is on the "edge of the abyss." "i want to say loud and clear to the israeli government, stop the bloodshed, stop the suffering, bring the detainees home, end the occupation. mr. netanyahu, stop this war now."

before golob named netanyahu, pakistani prime minister shahbaz sharif said, "can we as human beings remain silent when children are buried under the rubble of their broken homes? ... mere condemnation is not enough. . we must take immediate action to demand an immediate end to this bloodshed.”

can israel really be strong enough to go against the whole world?

actually, this is not the case.

us president biden

it’s nothing but the united states’ backing.

u.s. president joe biden said that israel's military actions were self-defense.

it seems that biden's rhetoric also contains elements of sympathy for lebanon. for example, he said, what happened on the border between israel and lebanon has displaced too many people. biden even said that "a diplomatic solution is still possible."

but biden, who is about to leave the u.s. president, is unable to come up with a diplomatic solution that can be discussed.

then israel opened its mouth like a lion.

what did netanyahu mean by those words? it's nothing more than threats and intimidation.

but is the essence of the middle east issue to make the islamic world fear israel? if such a situation is not reached, will the middle east become unstable?

obviously impossible!

what is the essence of the problem in the middle east?

should the netanyahu authorities think about this issue?

of course, on the other side, we must also realize that whether it is hezbollah in lebanon or some organizations that are in hot war with israel, they actually have the support of iran behind them. so, what are iran’s demands?

in other words, is there any talk between israel and iran?

if there is nothing to talk about, xiaoyin believes that there is no peace in the middle east!

if we find the "similarities" between iran and israel as soon as possible, let all parties understand the "differences" between them as soon as possible, and if we can seek common ground while coexisting in different places, the middle east can still have long-term peace and development! otherwise, the trouble will definitely last forever!

and the chaos in the middle east will inevitably lead to unrest in the world!