news

the taipei district prosecutors office said that there was no leak in the case of ke wenzhe. the blue camp blasted: should the green media be fined for making fake news?

2024-09-18

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the taipei district prosecutors office (tdpo) has repeatedly leaked information about the jinghuacheng scandal, and the pro-green media has repeatedly revealed the details of the case, which is suspected of manipulating public opinion. starting from the 12th, the tdpo has successively interviewed 5 reporters from weekly magazines, online media and tv stations to testify. none of the 5 reporters gave out the source of the information. the tdpo immediately claimed that the investigation team had no leaks. kmt legislator xu qiaoxin questioned that the tdpo said that there were many discrepancies between the report and the evidence. then the pro-green media reporter ma yuwen and others have violated the "social order maintenance act". should the taiwan "ncc" deal with the fake news concerns?

after the people's party chairman ko wen-je was detained and denied access to visitors due to the jinghuacheng case, another "media exclusive chaos" broke out. ma yuwen, a female reporter from the green media "sanli news", broke the news that the prosecutors and the anti-corruption agency found ko's usb drive with "1500 shen qingjing" written on it. she also claimed that she had been running the taiwan prosecutors and investigators for 7 years and had "200% trust" in the source of the news, and was sure that "1500" referred to "15 million yuan", which triggered public criticism that the investigation was not open and became a sham.

the taipei prosecutors took the initiative to investigate the case on the 9th, and interviewed two reporters from mirror weekly, two reporters from ling media, and sanli reporter ma yuwen as witnesses on the 12th, 13th, and 16th. all five were asked to leave after the interrogation, and none of them revealed the source of the information. the taipei prosecutors claimed that according to the investigation, the investigation team did not leak any secrets, and they refused to reveal the source of the information based on respect for the media's journalistic ethics.

on the 17th, xu qiaoxin said that this "ma 200" was the culprit. in the past, other reporters did not reveal the source of the news. but this "ma tianbing" directly told everyone that her news came from "the prosecutors and investigators who had been raising her for seven years." xu qiaoxin questioned that the northern district prosecutors office only said that her source of information did not come from the prosecutors and investigators, and openly said that this "200% trusted" person was lying? since it is fake news! should the "ncc" deal with it? should the green media channel be fined? did ma yuwen violate the "social security law"? yes!

zheng liwen, a former kmt legislator, also admitted that if the reporter did not hand over his cell phone and used "protecting the source of news" and "press freedom" as a talisman, the taipei prosecutors would not be able to investigate further. but the taipei prosecutors said that the report had nothing to do with the content of the file, so "sanli" was certified as making fake news? should it withdraw the news, apologize, and punish the reporter? should the "ncc" impose a fine? this is intervening in the investigation of a major judicial case, and it may hinder and disrupt the investigation of the case, which has a great impact.

zheng liwen also pointed out that if the reporter got the third-hand or fourth-hand information leaked by the northern district prosecutors office, would it be considered a leak? although the northern district prosecutors office did not leak the information to the reporter, could it be that the information was given to a representative or politician who has a good relationship with the prosecutors and investigators, and then passed on to the boss of the green media news station, and finally handed over to the reporter to write the news?

former legislator guo zhengliang believes that the key words "xiao shen 1500 shen qingjing" in the green media reporter's revelation cannot be "dreamed of". since it is said that it was not obtained from the northern prosecutors office, then what is the source of the information? obviously it must be a unit related to the northern prosecutors office. "you also say that what ma yuwen said is inconsistent with our files. isn't this nonsense? who would say exactly the same as you? we only talk about the point of 'xiao shen 1500 shen qingjing'. where did you see it? it must be related to your northern prosecutors office, right? we also asked some senior judicial reporters, and they don't know either."

guo zhengliang also mentioned that the people's party was really furious when they saw the press release. if the northern district prosecutors office knew that it was their people who leaked the information, they would basically be held criminally responsible and would have to prosecute. "it is obvious that they don't want to go this way. if they go this way, even ma yuwen will be guilty." guo zhengliang sighed, this is taiwan's misfortune, they still want to argue with such obvious facts.(lin jingxian, strait herald reporter in taiwan)