news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

at the outset, i would like to make an important preparatory point: to formulate correct diplomatic and economic strategies, we must have a global strategic perspective and vision.

this brings up an extremely important topic: compared with my country's increasing its holdings of u.s. debt and investing in africa, which one is safer? which one is more profitable?

let’s discuss them one by one.

for a long time, many "pseudo-scholars" have been attacking china's investment and sponsorship in african and latin american countries. their reason is that there are still so many poor people in china, why not use the money to subsidize them? why should we use it to aid african and south american countries?

we can compare this with the united states, which they admire the most. there are more than 600,000 people wandering and sleeping on the streets in the united states every day, and there are 20 million black people living at the bottom of society. but why did the united states provide more than 200 billion us dollars in aid to ukraine and israel? obviously, this is the united states' "investment", but it is just "war investment". because the way for the united states to become a strong country is to become a strong country through war.

so, china's aid in africa and the americas is essentially an investment. however, unlike the united states, china's investment is an investment in peace, development, and global strategic investment.