news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the chairman of the people's party, ko wen-je, was involved in the jinghua city plot ratio case. on the 1st, the taipei district prosecutors' office (hereinafter referred to as the "taipei prosecutors' office") held a detention hearing. on the 2nd, the taipei district court (hereinafter referred to as the "taipei court") believed that the prosecutors had serious suspicions of his crimes and that the explanations were still insufficient, so they ruled to release him without bail. on the 3rd, the taipei prosecutors' office appealed. the taiwan "high court" determined that ko wen-je was actively involved, and on the 4th, it revoked and sent the case back to the taipei court for further ruling. it was reported that the rotating judge of this detention court, lu zhengye, once called himself a "green judge", and the outside world generally believed that ko was not doing well. taipei city councilor you shuhui questioned that ko wen-je, who was the mayor of taipei city at the time, had held three other meetings with taipei city councilor ying hsiao-wei, and had also ordered them to assist in handling the case as soon as possible. how could he not know the case?

"i respect the judge's definition of 'not knowing', even though it goes against the conventional imagination of the mayor." you shuhui posted on facebook on the 4th that this case has now become a "jinghua strange case" and is related to ying hsiao-wei, with whom ko wen-je had a meeting, former taipei deputy mayor peng zhen-sheng, with whom he worked, and shen qing-jing, chairman of the viking group, who sang. in the end, only ko wen-je was left saying that he didn't know and he didn't understand.

you shuhui said frankly that during the investigation, they asked the staff of the taipei city urban development bureau and the public works bureau why they did not make some consideration estimates in advance? these people said frankly that it was because "the superiors told us to do it as soon as possible." the judge believed that ko wen-je did not attend the "urban committee" and had no way of knowing the resolution of the meeting. however, ko wen-je and ying hsiao-wei had three other meetings. they had meetings and gave instructions. it is impossible that he did not know the case. he must be quite familiar with the content and difficulties of the jinghua city case.

the taipei district court held another hearing on the jinghuacheng case at 9:30 am today (5th). taiwanese media person huang yangming believes that the taiwan "high court" has recognized the reasons for the taipei district prosecutors' prosecution to some extent. ko wen-je said that he was not aware of the incident at the time, and this part should be investigated again. however, the ruling sent back by the taiwan "high court" for retrial mentioned two points. the first is that the defendant actively intervened, which means that ko wen-je was actively pushing this case. ko wen-je played an active role in objective evidence. the second is that in terms of the financial flow, there was "no mention" again, which means that there was no financial flow.

huang yangming then pointed out that in theory, ko wen-je would still advocate what he originally advocated in the second detention hearing. now it depends on what evidence the northern district prosecutors office can produce compared to the detention hearing on the evening of the 1st, so that the judge will accept that ko wen-je committed a serious crime and that there was collusion, destruction of evidence, and other detention requirements.

in addition, when ke wenzhe left home at around 7 a.m. today, he saw a large number of media guarding his door and shouted "this is too exaggerated." however, he did not respond to the media's questions about the case.(lin jingxian, strait herald reporter in taiwan)