news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

kuai technology news on october 7th: recently, a dispute involving second-hand car transactions has attracted widespread attention.

according to xiaoli help, it is reported thatmr. gong from zhengzhou, henan, learned through an online platform on september 7 that someone was selling a second-hand xiaomi su7. he immediately decided to go to shijiazhuang, hebei to purchase the car and paid 205,000 yuan for the car.

according to mr. gong, he first paid 201,000 yuan to the seller and agreed to pay the remaining 4,000 yuan after the vehicle was transferred.however, after mr. gong drove the car back, the original owner suddenly asked for a price increase, which mr. gong refused.

subsequently, the original car owner canceled mr. gong's vehicle authorization through remote operation, resulting in the vehicle being locked and unable to be used normally.

after understanding, the original car owner said that the two parties only had a verbal agreement at that time and did not sign a formal car purchase contract. since mr. gong has not made all payments, he still retains control of the vehicle. the original car owner denied the price increase and insisted that the two parties had not reached an agreement on the final price at that time.

however, after checking the chat records between mr. gong and the original car owner, xiaoli found that the two parties had made a clear agreement on the purchase price of the vehicle, and mr. gong had paid most of the money as agreed. faced with this evidence, the original car owner changed his story and claimed that mr. gong asked him to send the chat record, and he did not recognize the content.

at present, mr. gong has decided to protect his legitimate rights and interests through legal means. he said he would seek legal aid and sue the original car owner, requiring the other party to perform the contract and compensate for the resulting losses.

lawyer said, in this incident, because the two parties clearly agreed on the vehicle price in the wechat chat, the contract has come into effect, part of the contract has been performed, and the vehicle has been delivered. therefore, as the vehicle seller, it should assist in fulfilling the transfer obligations, otherwise it should bear liability for breach of contract.

this incident once again reminds consumers that when trading second-hand goods, they must sign a formal contract or agreement and clearly stipulate the rights and obligations of both parties. at the same time, you must also keep relevant transaction records and evidence so that you can safeguard your legitimate rights and interests in the event of a dispute.