news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

ren kai, chief commentator of zonglan news

working at the age of 14? is this another legendary example of a "mature young man"? recently, the demolition of a university student's orchard by the executive deputy county chief hu weize in ye county, henan province, caused an uproar. careful netizens found that the executive deputy county chief's work history on the official website of the ye county government had changed, and his time of working was suspected to have changed from 14 to 17. according to jimu news, the organization department of the pingdingshan municipal party committee responded that it was investigating the matter.

on november 9, 2021, a netizen saved hu weize's work resume. the relevant link reminded that this is a webpage snapshot of the official website of ye county government. it is shown that hu weize was born in may 1971 and started working in march 1985. from march 1985 to december 1999, he worked in the standing committee of the people's congress of xinhua district. continue to open this webpage snapshot and enter the same website. the page still shows hu weize's work resume. the difference is that the time of joining the work is march 1988, and the rest of the work resume is exactly the same as the webpage snapshot.

before there is an official response, it cannot be confirmed that hu weizhe's work resume is fake. however, the time he started working is suspected to be changed from 14 to 17 years old, which is indeed unreasonable and inevitably makes the public suspicious.

if it is due to negligence of the relevant departments, they should be clarified and held accountable promptly. the resume of cadres is the basic information for the management of state cadres. if even these data are distorted and can be changed at will, then what else can't be falsified? the government's official website represents the face of a place, and behind it is the credibility of the local government. if even the most basic information and data such as the resume of cadres are wrong, how can they win the trust of the people?

if the resume is indeed falsified, it should be dealt with seriously. as we all know, age is one of the important criteria for the selection and appointment of cadres. some official speculators change their age to a lower level, which is nothing more than "taking up a position and getting a title." party members and cadres concealing their true age is a serious violation of regulations and disciplines. it not only violates party discipline and rules, but also disrupts the normal operation of the mechanism for selecting and employing people and breaks political rules. the modification of resumes is by no means a matter of changing a few numbers. from the direct consequences, it not only undermines the seriousness and authority of the cadres' resumes, but also, in terms of potential impact, this behavior harms social fairness and justice and pollutes the political ecology of a place.

the executive deputy county chief's resume on the official website was modified. was it due to negligence of the data entry personnel, or was there something fishy about the personal file itself? this matter needs to be investigated as soon as possible and explained to the public. if it is a misunderstanding, the truth should be clarified, and a detailed and authoritative investigation should be conducted to clear up the online doubts and clear the name of the executive deputy county chief. if the facts are confirmed and there is indeed age fraud, it should be dealt with seriously and a "zero tolerance" attitude should be adopted towards fraud.

when faced with officials whose resumes are questionable, we hope that local authorities will not easily excuse the public by saying "data entry errors". government information disclosure departments and relevant agencies responsible for the appointment and removal of officials should conduct strict inspections. once resume fraud is discovered, the relevant personnel must be held accountable. if it is simply the negligence of the staff, they should also be held accountable for laziness and lack of meticulous work.