news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

The Paris Olympics has come and gone, and the US men's basketball team has returned home with a full load of gold medals, but some people still have something to say about the final reward system for the US men's basketball team. Skip Bayless, a well-known "LeBron hater", blasted James for winning the MVP of this Olympics, and believed that Curry's performance in the last two games was outstanding, and he deserved the award more than James. The competition between Curry and James for the Olympic MVP actually reflects the views of some fans: Is the Olympic MVP based on the overall situation, or the results of one or two games?

Skip actually had long been fed up with James winning the MVP. Shortly after the team defeated France in the final, Skip commented, "I'm sorry, James can't be the MVP anymore. This has to be gradual." Therefore, when he heard that FIFA officially awarded the MVP to James, Skip said the sentence at the beginning of this article. In his opinion, Curry's performance in the last two games was amazing, with a total of 17 three-pointers. Without him, the team would not have won, and the MVP should have been awarded to Curry. He even said that it was a "shame" to award the MVP to James.

I believe that many fans will agree with Skip's point of view, which involves a question: Is the Olympic MVP based on the overall result or the result of one or two games?