cover commentary | see again the introduction of "dr. water" into colleges and universities. are they really confused or pretending to be confused?
2024-09-30
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
□jiang jingjing
recently, shanxi taiyuan preschool teachers college released a number of announcements on the introduction of doctoral students and admission-related announcements on its official website, triggering controversy over the "batch of accelerated phds" (also known as "doctors of water"). judging from the public announcement, most of the 10 talents to be introduced are doctoral candidates who graduated from southeast asian countries, such as adamson university in the philippines, assumption university in thailand, etc. in the face of doubts, the school's office staff responded that it is currently only the interview (non-interview) results publicity stage, and there will be a series of follow-up procedures to be carried out. "there is no job creation based on people, and all the real-name phds announced have no connection with the school." ". (china news service)
there has been precedent for universities to introduce overseas "water doctors" in batches. as the media followed up the investigation, the ins and outs behind it have been roughly sorted out. in such cases, the "returnee phds" introduced are basically former university faculty and staff who went abroad for gold-plating and then "returned to school after graduation." recently, the operation of shanxi taiyuan preschool teachers college was once classified as such by public opinion. what is surprising is that in the face of this doubt, the school quickly came forward to deny everything. "all the public real-name doctors have no connection with the school." this resolute response only made things confusing again.
if the school's response is true, then this controversial "introduction of dr. water" does not belong to the typical model of "gilding and then returning" in the past. but even so, the public's questions and confusions are still increasing. this "introduction announcement" was almost dominated by yishui's southeast asian water blog. this must be difficult to say is a coincidence. if the "return type water doctors" in the past were just people who entertained themselves and gained weight internally, then the case of taiyuan preschool teachers college revealed another greater risk: these water doctors actually is it really possible to find a teaching position in a domestic university with a worthless diploma?
it is reported that this batch of introduced "doctors" will receive "a settlement allowance within 200,000 yuan and a scientific research start-up fee within 100,000 yuan" provided by the school. it should be said that this is a huge benefit. in this case, are there no formal universities and serious phd candidates to apply for jobs? why is it that the "dr. water" from a southeast asian university can stand out? the more important the distribution of interests is involved, the more scientific the rules, the process, and the results must be fair. when colleges and universities introduce talents, they should set up a firm threshold and prefer to have a shortage rather than an excess - not only diplomas and academic qualifications, but also "academic ability" and "ability." he didn't refuse anyone who came, accepted all the offers from shuibo and treated them well, which was really laughable and generous.
netizens can see through it at a glance, and the media can find out about "dr. shui" at a glance. why do some colleges and universities fail to recognize people? is this a "cognitive defect" or "information blind spot", or is it pretending to be confused? allowing a group of "water doctors" to dominate the talent recruitment process is not only entrusting teaching positions and funding to others, but also humiliating and depriving those "real doctors" of opportunities. similar farces cannot be repeated again.
