news

in response to the online public opinion caused by a recent talk show, film producer guan yadi published an article severely criticizing the video platform's review issues, saying that "the video website's corresponding program review link was seriously derelict in its duty, or intentionally abused its power, and the producer of this talk show was also obviously derelict in its duty and seriously unprofessional in its own content planning and production."

guan yadi said in the article that a female artist used her performance on stage to make veiled moral accusations against another male actor, which triggered a huge online public opinion, and was a typical bad example of the generalization of social morality. guan yadi asked the program team three questions: "what was the producer of this talk show thinking, allowing a female artist to publicly make veiled moral attacks on another male actor in front of tens of millions of viewers across the country? just by talking? and for all the negative situations that followed, they felt that saying "joking" was an excuse?"

what kind of production and review process should a professional program go through? if something goes wrong, who should be the first person responsible? in the long article, guan yadi specifically mentioned her experience as an invited columnist and special author in traditional media for more than 20 years: after the topic selection is completed and the first draft is completed, it needs to be strictly reviewed by the editor and then the editor-in-chief; once there is a problem with the content, the primary responsibility is the main editor who signs the version, followed by the editor and the writer. guan yadi used this experience from the perspective of normal traditional media to point out that the greater responsible persons should be the video platform and the program team. "i hope that whether it is the program team or the video platform, when producing excellent content, they will not forget the basic media ethics, instead of letting themselves become a media monster that constantly consumes massive data and topics that have nothing to do with the truth."

although guan yadi did not name the parties involved in the incident in her article, it is clear that this is her opinion on the recent incident in the entertainment industry caused by a female star's appearance on a talk show. judging from the implicit description of the female star in the show, the audience and netizens may be satirizing her ex-boyfriend, the archery athlete yu shi, for his cheating during their relationship. the female star even used a homophonic name to say this person's name - yu shi.

in fact, yu shi is in the rising period of his career, with many important works about to be released. the disturbance caused by this program has undoubtedly brought him a lot of pressure.

after many days of silence, yu shi studio issued a statement on september 15, saying that it would take legal action against the false remarks on the internet.

the statement specifically mentioned that due to continued malicious defamation, it has formally sued accounts involved in spreading false information in order to clarify the facts and safeguard legitimate rights and interests.

regardless of the truth, this incident once again reminds us that the harm of online violence cannot be ignored. as public figures, celebrities should be more cautious about their words and deeds; as content production organizations and publishing platforms, they should also strengthen content review, ensure the legality and moral ethics of program content, and create a healthy and orderly entertainment environment.