2024-09-09
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
in 1900, liang qichao proposed in his “ode to the pacific in the 20th century” that “there are four ancient civilizations on earth: china, india, egypt, and asia minor”. since then, the four ancient civilizations have been deeply rooted in the minds of the chinese people. perhaps because of the majestic pyramids, the ancient egyptian civilization is the most shocking to the chinese people.
one hundred years later, the historical archaeological research led by the west has been questioned by the chinese, including the ancient egyptian civilization. especially when chinese archaeology makes some major discoveries, people often can't help but compare them with ancient egypt, sumer, and ancient greece, and then question their authenticity.
the question is: the more archaeological discoveries china makes, the more mysteries of chinese history it reveals. but why do they make people more question ancient egypt, sumer, and ancient greece, and make people believe in "western pseudo-history theories" more?
the reason is simple. the more archaeological discoveries china makes, the more it reveals a credible civilization evolution process that conforms to the logic of social evolution. in contrast, ancient egypt and other historical accounts in the west "coincidentally" violate normal evolutionary logic. next, let's take a look at the following comparisons:
first, food and population