news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

do you still remember the "haikun" submarine on the other side of the strait that was launched a year ago and launched only half a year ago?it's really becoming a joke.

(haikun)

according to reports from mainland media cited by guancha.com, the mainland’s defense department recently confirmed that the haikun submarine could not be “closed” in the third quarter of 2025 as originally planned.need to be postponed for at least 4 years to the third quarter of 2029, and the "case closed" here refers to "official delivery". this is puzzling. a 2,500-ton conventional-powered submarine will take five years to be outfitted, including this year? with this time, the mainland can build a large aircraft carrier. so what is the thing that is being launched on the other side of the strait?

in fact, from the very beginning when it was launched, the outside world discovered that this thing might not even be considered a semi-finished product. as a conventional-powered submarine built in the 21st century, the "haikun" had no periscope, no sonar, and no aip system when it was first launched.a pure "three-no product"; after a period of trouble, it is said that the periscope has been installed, but the plan of the other side to purchase mk-48mod6at torpedoes from the united states will be postponed to 2030. in other words, even if this submarine can be put into service in 2029, it will be "a submarine without missiles" by then, or "three nothings" - the first one is like this, but the other side has placed an order for 7 of the same type in one go.

(the craftsmanship quality of the "haikun" is hard to describe)

to be honest, when the technology is not yet mature and has not undergone strict certification, and the first boat has already been built in a mess, they still dare to continue placing large orders. apart from "money laundering", the outside world really can't think of any reasonable explanation.

there is an interesting thing here. although huang shuguang, the first promoter of "taiwan-made submarines", has resigned, his sister huang shanshan was recently involved in the ke wenzhe corruption case. now it seems that both the brother and sister are not clean, and the truth behind this is that the quality of the other side of the strait has not changed at all in the past few decades.all he talks about is ideology, but all he thinks about is business!

(the unknown bulge is incomprehensible)

it is hard for us to imagine where the other side is going to use the seven submarines. generally speaking, the strait is not suitable for submarine underwater combat. whether it is the pla or the us military, nuclear submarines or conventional submarines will definitely float when passing through the strait, because the underwater undercurrents, shoals and reefs in the strait are minefields for underwater vehicles; but the other side is preparing to use them to prevent the pla from landing ships in the strait. according to the routine of the other side's "han guang exercise", using patriots to block dongfeng, using f-16vs to block j-20s, and using submarines to block landing ships, it can last for at least a year or two. not to mention whether it can wait for the us military to come, at least it can send those taiwan independence leaders away.

(compared with the mainland, the gap in craftsmanship is visible to the naked eye)

however, this "decisive weapon" that the other side of the strait has high hopes for is not only a "three-no product", but also has to be delayed for several years. even lai ching-te will not see it put into service during his term.

besides, by 2029, it is hard to say whether the rebellious regime on the other side of the strait will still exist; for us,this "haikun" submarine is simply a kind of "industrial garbage" and is not even worth collecting., other artillery and tanks can be considered cultural relics after all, and it would be embarrassing to drag the "haikun" to our port and put it there. so no matter from which angle,there is no other explanation except "money laundering".

(the other side will only feel despair at the gap in power)

as the gap in power between the two sides of the strait grows larger and larger, the other side's behavior of "resisting reunification by force" is either a variety of mysterious operations or more despair; the process of reunification will not be stopped by a few weapons, and any resistance from the other side will only make itself more guilty at the final reckoning!