news

is ke wenzhe's "no guarantee" a safe escape? facing "six-way attack", the future is still uncertain

2024-09-02

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the taipei district prosecutors office investigated the "jinghua city floor area ratio fraud case" and the prosecutors charged him with corruption and profiteering and ordered him to be detained and banned from meeting with the chairman of the people's party.ke wenzhewith former deputy mayor of taipeipeng zhenshengafter working through the night of the 1st and the early morning of the 2nd, the taipei district court finally ruled thatno insurance please return”。

the best scenario for ko wen-je was that the island media initially judged thatpay a large sum of money for bail",turn out"no insurance please return", it's like heaven and hell. the so-called "return without bail" means that after the prosecutor or the court interrogates the person, the judge believes that the person will not flee for fear of crime, so there is no need to ask for a sum of money to guarantee that he will not flee. he does not need to be detained and can leave on his own and be released in court.

however, this "no bail" does not mean the case is closed. it just means that the judge has determined that the possibility of the defendant fleeing or hiding from appearing in court is low.

in fact, the offensive and defensive battle between prosecutors and court judges revolved around the debate on whether to detain ko and peng. detention is actually a very serious compulsory punishment. ko wen-je must be restricted in his personal freedom even if he is not found guilty, which has a great impact on his personal rights and interests. therefore, judicial operations need to be handled very carefully.

in the end, the judge's ruling surprised many people. the "no bail" directly slapped the prosecutor in the face. the four words mean that the judge believes that the prosecutor's information cannot convince the judge that ke wenzhe is a serious suspect, has no evidentiary value, and will not be accepted.

the political environment on the island is not conducive to the development of small parties.

after the democratic progressive party came to power, it stepped up its anti-corruption efforts. the top target within the party iszheng wencan, the top target outside the party is notke wenzhein the eyes of the opponents of the white camp,only by completely denying ko’s personality and confirming his “negative image as a greedy politician” can his “political death” be caused, and the “little grass” who support ko p will have a chance to return to the green camp. although whether they will return is still in doubt.

ke wenzhe himself facedthe "six-pronged attack" is divided into the "first three" routes: media, celebrities, and cyber troops; and the "last three" routes: prosecutors, investigation bureaus, and courts.

first, they used the "front three-pronged attack" of the media, celebrities, and cyber troops to maliciously spread false information and create the image of ko as a collusion between officials and businessmen, and then convicted him through the "back three-pronged attack".

ko wen-je put it bluntly: searching homes, offices, and especially the people's party headquarters is incomprehensible.seizing cell phones and hard drives, making up stories, and using extreme oppression and abuseif the information is not enough, they will look for it from the information on the mobile phones and computers of the people's party and make up a story. this practice makes ko shudder.

this time,rather than saying that ke wenzhe held on, it would be better to say that the judges of the court held on., lian ke himself also said that the northern district prosecutors office oppressed and tortured him for nearly 70 hours.i have told the judge not to make things difficult for me. the judge is the one who is really working hard. he should bear the pressure.”。

the taipei district court is clashing with the taipei district prosecutors' office? will the "six-way clampdown" disintegrate or split?

whether or not someone is in custody is different from whether or not someone is guilty.for example, gao hongan was initially released on bail of nt$600,000, but after the trial, she was found guilty. on the contrary, there are also many cases where people who were detained were eventually found not guilty.

another protagonist of the case, former deputy mayor peng zhensheng, is still in custody. it is worth noting that peng himself has agreed to cooperate with the prosecution, but the judge still ruled that he must be detained and denied access to visitors.

this shows that the court or the presiding judge himself did not "follow the crowd" with the prosecution. from a professional perspective, peng's interests may be far greater than ko's.

if the prosecution wants to convict ko wen-je, they will have to work harder.

the judge's ruling reflects independence, but the entire judicial process or offensive and defensive battle is still in a very preliminary stage. there is not even an indictment, and the prosecutor will also appeal the court's ruling. ke wenzhe is far from celebrating with champagne.

if his opponents are determined to liquidate ko wen-je and hunt him down politically, then today's "repatriation without protection" does not mean that he has completely passed the test. the situation is still dangerous and his fate is still uncertain.