news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

Recently, Shanghai-based AMEC announced that it had filed a lawsuit in a US court, suing the US Department of Defense for listing it on the "Chinese Military Enterprise List". Prior to this, another Chinese technology company, Hesai Technology, had allegedly successfully "forced" the Pentagon to remove it from the sanctions list through litigation. This was seen by some Western media as an "embarrassing reversal" by the Pentagon, and some US media even asked "why it is so difficult for the US Department of Defense to prove that Chinese companies are 'involved in the military'".

This attitude of pretending to be surprised is ridiculous. Is there any need to ask why the Pentagon, which has the strongest military in the world, has "many difficulties" in accusing Chinese companies? "They seem to lack strong evidence", that's the whole reason. Such a simple truth has aroused the "confusion" of the American public opinion "why many Chinese companies included in the list can repeatedly sue government agencies including the US Department of Defense and succeed", and they are pretending to look for reasons everywhere.They are actually telling the whole world that many charges against the US are already preset in advance and are bound to be pinned on Chinese companies.

Before these two companies, Chinese companies such as Xiaomi and Luokuang had filed lawsuits and finally forced the US Department of Defense to change its decision and remove them from the list. This just proves that the US list is a "political list" that lacks evidence and maliciously suppresses Chinese companies.In recent years, under the influence of pan-security thinking, the US administrative agencies have launched countless unfair so-called "investigations" against Chinese companies based on rumors and innuendos. Washington is well aware of this.Some people have added a "democratic filter" to the Pentagon's setback, claiming that this is "the administrative cost that must be borne for adhering to democracy and the rule of law." This forced self-saving cannot change the essence of the matter, which is that it will be "full of difficulties" to prove a false fact.