news

is it necessary to review the announcement of the dishonest list and the rejection of admissions?

2024-10-04

한어한어Русский языкРусский языкEnglishEnglishFrançaisFrançaisIndonesianSanskritIndonesian日本語SanskritDeutsch日本語PortuguêsDeutschΕλληνικάPortuguêsespañolΕλληνικάItalianoespañolSuomalainenItalianoLatinaSuomalainenLatina

of course, public opinion can criticize and condemn dishonest behavior, but perhaps more importantly, the entire system of recommended admissions should be re-examined.

recently, the "2024 fudan university school of management dishonest list of dishonest recruitment" published on the official website of fudan university school of management stated that four undergraduate students committed "extremely serious violations of integrity" during the selection process, and their dishonesty showed seriously affect his personal credibility and harm the interests of relevant colleges and other applicants. another six students committed "serious breaches of integrity."

over the years, there have been quite a few turmoils in the process of pushing for exemptions from colleges and universities. some university professors even directly posted on their personal social media content that they were "fed" by students. therefore, after fudan university issued the announcement, many netizens left messages in the news comment area. it seems that the matter has indeed resonated.

however, it is still quite rare for the college to publicly issue a notice and criticize the relevant students in such harsh terms. if it wasn't really "unbearable", it wouldn't be like this. it can be seen that the behavior of these students has seriously affected the admissions work, and it is not fair to other students.

it’s really not appropriate to eat what’s in the pot and look at what’s in the bowl. but to be fair, the students involved also have unspeakable "difficulties."the so-called exemption system is originally a two-way choice and a relatively long process. when every student begins to apply, he is not sure that his application will be approved, nor is he sure that his final thoughts will change. he will inevitably have a "riding the donkey to find the horse" attitude.

some netizens also questioned that in the current promotion process, colleges and universities will reach an agreement with their classmates. since they have said it first, how can they not be honest? in fact, some "breach of contract" behaviors are not difficult to understand - the opportunity is in front of them, and the students dare not give up, and no one dares to say that there will be better opportunities in the future, so they agree first.

this involves another question - what will happen if there is a "breach of contract"? going back to the previous news, although the school of management of fudan university issued a stern notice, it is actually difficult to take substantive measures to punish the relevant students because they have not yet entered the school. it can be seen that universities and students actually have their own difficulties, and this kind of "mutual pulling" may not completely disappear in the future.

furthermore, students are always at a disadvantage compared to universities. once the school makes a decision that is unfavorable to the students, if there is no preparation in advance, it may be too late to regret it.

so, what to do? of course, public opinion can criticize and condemn dishonest behavior, but perhaps more importantly, the entire system of recommended and exempt admissions should be re-examined to see if there is anything that can be optimized and improved, so that both parties have some room for maneuver.

experts in the education field have long put forward many suggestions, such as establishing a scientific supplementary admission mechanism. after a student regrets, the opportunity will be immediately given to other willing students; another example is establishing a deposit system, which requires a deposit to be paid after reaching an agreement. , the relevant fees will be refunded after confirmation of enrollment, etc.

it should be said that with the development of the exemption system today, it is normal for some disputes and problems to arise.how to maintain and give full play to the institutional advantages of the exemption system and avoid its disadvantages is the direction that should be actively explored in the future.every student who applies should also realize that integrity is a required course whether they are studying knowledge on campus or entering society in the future. schools should also have a more flexible mechanism to select talents more fairly and reasonably through recommended admissions.

red star news special commentator jin yu