news

real case! the score was 3-0 at halftime and the bookmaker called to ask if they could play two more games and the final score was 5-0

2024-09-12

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

according to sohu sports, on september 12, beijing time, the chinese football association announced a list of "banned players" on september 10, of which 43 were sentenced to life and 17 were sentenced to five years. after the list was released, many players involved, including sun zhunhao, evolo, wang song, and lu ning, denied participating in match-fixing. the famous blogger "chinese super league observer" expressed his views.

chinese super league observers said:

many players, including sun junhao and wang song, are crying out for injustice. so why do they feel it is unfair?

some games are like this, and what these players have to do is to win and get the score that the bookmaker wants.in the end, the score came out and the players involved felt that since i won the game it was definitely not a fixed match, so they felt at ease taking the money.in their perception, this kind of match is not a fixed match, because they did not sell the ball, so they feel wronged.

let me tell you a real case. i won’t mention any names, you can check it out on your own.a certain old team played against a certain team that has disappeared in the central region. they scored 3 goals in the first half. during the halftime break, the bookmaker called the head coach through an intermediary and asked if they could score 2 more goals in the second half. in the end, they got a positive answer. the final score of the game was 5-0.the handicap opened by the bookmaker was exactly that the home team would give three goals, and the bookmaker won a big victory. the coaches and players who participated in the game of course also received a bonus. in their view, this was a real game and it was reasonable to charge them money.

during the lockdown, many matches were conducted in the same way as the case mentioned above. it is true that they did not sell the balls, but they did cooperate with the bookmakers in making the matches. do you think they were wronged?