news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the renovation of the ambassador hotel in kaohsiung was questioned by residents on both sides. the city government held a meeting on the 5th and said that it would entrust a third party to re-evaluate the property. the policy changed. when asked on the 6th whether kaohsiung mayor chen chi-mai would "actively intervene" in the case, he said that because the two appraisal reports used different methods, he asked a third party to re-evaluate the results. netizens said that as long as the color is right, the plot ratio can be 10,000%.

the ambassador hotel in kaohsiung applied for reconstruction of its dilapidated property, including bonus volume, and the overall plot ratio was raised to 1142%. neighboring residents questioned the identification of the dilapidated property. after the environmental impact assessment meeting on the 5th, the kaohsiung city public works bureau announced that the case involved public safety and decided to entrust a third-party agency approved by the taiwan authorities' interior department to conduct a re-evaluation.

residents of the buildings on both sides of the "ambassador hotel" in kaohsiung questioned the structural safety assessment report submitted by the kaohsiung city architects association in 2020, which showed that the r-value was less than 30. they were puzzled why, more than a year later, the r-value of the visa report issued by the taipei city technicians association to apply for reconstruction of dilapidated buildings was as high as 65.71.

regarding the outside world's doubts about the reconstruction of kaohsiung's "guobin", the city government's position "turned sharply". did chen chi-mai "actively intervene"? chen chi-mai said in an interview that the method used by the taipei structural engineers association is different from the original method of public security assessment of buildings. because the two appraisal reports use different methods, the city government will entrust a third party to make a fair and professional judgment, and will conduct appraisals in accordance with the third party's results in the future.

previously, the city government's public works bureau responded many times that there was "no problem" with this case, emphasizing that according to the "dangerous and old buildings regulations", the procedures and standards for applying for preliminary evaluation of dangerous and old building reconstruction are consistent throughout taiwan. the applicants entrust 32 professional institutions approved by the interior department to conduct preliminary evaluations of the earthquake resistance of dangerous and old buildings, which are then reviewed by professional institutions. the reward volume is granted according to relevant regulations, and no other volume reward projects have been created.

however, on the afternoon of the 5th, the public works bureau suddenly changed its attitude and announced that in view of the fact that this case involves public safety, the public works bureau has decided to entrust a third-party agency approved by the ministry of the interior to re-evaluate the case.

in this regard, netizens said, "is chen chi-mai feeling guilty?" "those with dpp id cards don't need to be nervous." "whatever our people say is right, just black out the information." "case closed because of different time and party backgrounds." "why is the wing gone? today, even if it is 10,000%, anything is fine as long as the color is right." "lai ching-te said: you have a good relationship with tsai ing-wen, although you have a dpp id card. look at what happened to the eldest brother (zheng wencan). you can handle it yourself, warm man."