news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the factory building worth 130 million yuan was sold for 18,000 yuan.

on august 5, the xicheng district people's court of beijing auctioned a factory worth 130 million yuan. the transaction confirmation showed that a natural person named liu tao successfully bid the highest price of 18,162.97 yuan for the 130 million yuan target.

after the incident fermented, on august 7, the auction platform deleted the auction content and the court also revoked the auction.

on august 29, a reporter from the "daily economic news" learned from the bidder liu tao that after unsuccessful negotiations with the court, liu tao had filed an objection to the execution, and the court had received the execution objection letter.

an objection to execution has been filed

previously, a reporter from the "daily economic news" learned from liu tao about his participation in the auction.

it is reported that after the court cancelled the auction, it called liu tao, but the two sides failed to reach an agreement. on the afternoon of august 14, liu tao met with the staff of the beijing xicheng district people's court and had a one-hour communication, but the two sides still failed to reach an agreement.

"they told me two relevant laws and regulations, but i may not particularly agree with them. then i may continue to follow the next process and initiate an objection to the execution." liu tao told reporters at the time.

on august 28, liu tao told the reporter of "daily economic news" that he had filed an objection to the execution, and the express delivery information showed that the execution objection letter had been signed for by the court.

on august 29, liu tao called judge gong of the xicheng district people's court of beijing, and the other party confirmed that he had received the execution objection letter sent by mail.

the execution objection letter shows that liu tao requested the court to issue him an "auction transaction ruling" in accordance with the records of the "auction transaction confirmation letter" (bidding no. 231252971).

liu tao believes that the no-reserve auction, the price increment and the procedures adopted in this sale are in compliance with legal provisions. this sale involves the execution of criminal property, the no-reserve auction is reasonable and legal, the price increment has been publicly announced, and no one has raised any objections during the period. the price increment does not violate legal provisions, and the low transaction price is not a circumstance under which the auction can be revoked according to legal provisions.

on august 30, liu tao stated that the lawyer said that the execution objection had been filed, with the case number: (2024) jing 0102 zhi yi no. 1482.

on august 30, a reporter from the national business daily called judge gong, but he did not respond directly, only asking the reporter to contact a colleague in the news department and providing a phone number. however, no one answered the phone when the reporter called the number.

in addition, the reporter also called the judge who presided over the above-mentioned execution objection, but the call was not answered.

what happened that caused the auction to be withdrawn and the buyer to file an objection to execution?

it is reported that starting from july 7, the xicheng district people's court of beijing issued an announcement on the jd.com asset trading platform. the announcement shows that the xicheng district people's court of beijing will conduct a public sale activity on the jd.com judicial auction network platform of the xicheng district people's court of beijing from 10:00 on august 2, 2024 (the sale period is 60 days) (excluding the bidding period and delay).

the factory involved has been deleted from the auction platform

the target building has 6 floors, and the assessment object is located on floors 1 to 6, with a total construction area of ​​9,550.64 square meters. the building structure is reinforced concrete and the planned use is industrial.

it is understood that the factory building has been publicly auctioned twice on the jd asset trading platform, but both failed to sell. currently, the factory building is rented by anhui rijing control technology co., ltd., and the rent has been paid until april 4, 2024.

da wan news reported that the factory building started at 1 yuan, with a prepayment of 1 yuan and a deposit of 0.2 yuan, and the increment was 0.01 yuan each time. according to the sale announcement, after the sale begins, if someone bids 1 yuan and no one bids within 24 hours, the 1 yuan bid will be the final sale price; if someone bids at the end of 24 hours, the price will be automatically delayed by 5 minutes.

after more than two days of bidding, when the bidding ended on august 5, 2024, there were 140 bidders in this judicial sale, and the number of delays was as high as 31,674 times.

in the end, natural person liu tao won the bid of 130 million yuan with the highest price of 18,162.97 yuan.

buyer: participating in the auction was accidental

xiaoxiang morning news reported that one of the creditors of the factory that was sold was mr. liu, a citizen of hefei. on august 6, mr. liu told the media that the current owner of the factory owed him more than 30 million yuan, and he hoped to obtain the ownership of the factory through bidding. to his surprise, "the entire 6-story building was sold for 18,000 yuan!" on the morning of august 5, when he saw that the sale ended with a bid of 18,000 yuan, he was so angry that he almost fainted. he took his family to report the situation to the court that day.

the luzhong morning news reported that the xicheng district people's court of beijing said that the court attached great importance to this incident and was organizing personnel to conduct a careful investigation and would definitely give the public a satisfactory answer.

liu tao previously told the daily economic news that he chose to participate in this auction by chance. on august 3, liu tao was watching a short video at home and saw an introduction to judicial auctions. he learned that there would be some interesting and diverse items in judicial auctions. after watching the video, liu tao immediately decided to try searching on the platform. after browsing taobao and not finding any interesting items, he chose to go to jd.com to have a look.

it is worth mentioning that after searching on jd.com, the first thing that came up was the information about the 130 million yuan factory auction. the bidding price at that time had reached 800 yuan, so liu tao participated in it.

on august 3, liu tao bid several times, but because there were too many bidders during the day, he ignored them and only paid attention to whether the auction was over. on the night of august 4, because he couldn't sleep, liu tao simply participated in the auction and stayed up all night. unexpectedly, he actually won the bid. "i can remember the last numbers of the bidders who participated in the auction."

liu tao believes that the unreasonableness of this auction is not the starting price of 1 yuan, but the price increase, which can only be 0.01 yuan each time.