news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

recently, in a live political program on hubei huangshi radio and television station, chen he, a professor at huazhong university of science and technology, criticized local officials for abusing their power, which attracted attention.

the reason why chen he was angry was: on august 28, in the 15th episode of daye tv's political program,residents have repeatedly reported the safety hazard of freezing rain breaking cement through the 12345 mayor hotline, but it has never been resolved. hu, the 12345 commissioner in charge of the local town government, responded that "the hanging line does not affect his daily life." in response to another resident's report of a dump truck dumping dirt at the door, the commissioner complained, "you only think about yourself, how can the truck driver make money?" it was this response that made professor chen he angry during the commentary session, and he accused the staff member of abusing his power.

because professor chen's comments were very direct and merciless, the relevant political footage has been circulated on the internet in recent days.a media interviewed professor chen he, who said that there was no rehearsal for the live broadcast and that commenting on the show was his usual style.

sharp and direct, this is indeed professor chen he's "style of questioning politics". in previous tv question-and-answer sessions, she also called out to the "great gods" in the administrative department."when doing things, we must dare to take tough measures and take responsibility"; he angrily denounced grassroots cadres as "austere judges" and "how did they become cadres?" such a straightforward and sharp commentary style has also earned professor chen he a lot of praise on the internet.

chen he's outspokenness makes the tv political program "spicy", which is the fundamental reason why the program has attracted attention. tv political program is essentially a form of public opinion supervision. the audience expects to see the officials being questioned on the program to face the pain points of people's livelihood and solve practical difficulties for the people.the guest commentator should be sharp enough and hit the nail on the head. the worst thing to do is to be all friendly and hypocritical on stage, which would turn into a show of "just setting up the stage but not performing the show".

in recent years, in order to facilitate public opinion supervision, many places have launched tv political programs. the heads of relevant departments come to the front desk to answer questions from the host and guests. many programs have indeed played a positive role, not only helping the masses solve urgent problems, but also improving the image of local governments and officials.

but at the same time, we should also see that, on the one hand, many of the once influential political programs were short-lived, and after a period of popularity, they soon "disappeared into oblivion"; on the other hand, many programs started high and ended low, and gradually became mediocre in the test of time, becoming decorations and "showpieces" in name only.

in this context, chen he and the tv political program he participated in are particularly valuable. frankly speaking, regardless of whether the people's demands can be finally resolved, the resounding and powerful direct "confrontation" in the program alone reflects a kind of impact and conveys the impression that public opinion is fully valued. the public has seen genuine public opinion supervision, and the psychological shock it brings is also real.

chen he and this tv political program have won the respect of the audience and set an example for tv political programs because of their courage to face the problems directly and not beat around the bush.through such a platform, the public's voice can be amplified and the government's decisions and actions can be supervised, truly achieving the goal of asking the people for their opinions and exercising power for the people.

of course, the political attitude and the solution of actual problems are still two different concepts, and there is still a long distance between them. in the past, there have been cases where people were very active on stage but dragged their feet behind the scenes.in some political programmes, officials and guests perform completely according to pre-written scripts. even if the atmosphere on stage is tense, it is all a trick of using the power of others to bully others and does not deserve the audience's praise and applause.

so, listen to what they say and watch what they do.political discussion on tv requires both attitude and effectivenesschen he's honesty presents the audience with the image of a conscientious intellectual who actively participates in public affairs and dares to criticize and supervise the government. we also hope that after this ruthless criticism, the departments and staff involved can truly reflect on themselves, take the people's affairs to heart, and do practical and good things for the people.