news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

summary:take a step back and let breast hyperplasia and ovarian cysts endure for a while. people who abide by the rules cannot be made to feel aggrieved. this incident is not just the aggrieved person, but a public aggrieved person. if reconciliation is not accepted, everyone is waiting for a follow-up in qingdao that can calm people's hearts. does she have any background? what supports her arrogance? who wants to make a big deal out of a small matter? "not fighting back after being beaten" is a double aggrieved physical and mental situation. just laws have the obligation to calm and untie people's lung and heart knots.

produced by tucao youth

this video really made my blood pressure soar. i've seen arrogant people, but i've never seen anyone so arrogant: driving against the flow, cutting in line, swearing, beating people, chasing and beating people endlessly, and escaping.

recently, the incident of a female land rover driver in qingdao, shandong province, who cut in line and beat someone in the wrong direction, has attracted the attention of the entire network. the beaten man told reporters that he was a veteran and did not give way to the woman who cut in line in the wrong direction. then wang got out of the car and insulted and beat him, saying, "what's wrong with me going in the wrong direction? what's wrong with me hitting you? are you calling the police?" from the video, it can be seen that the woman was beaten to the point of spitting blood and her face was swollen. the qingdao police reported that the woman who beat him was administratively detained for 10 days and fined 1,000 yuan. the beaten man said that he still feels uncomfortable in his head. the beater did not apologize or compensate for medical expenses afterwards. he said: i don't know who is the umbrella behind her. i will not compromise and i want justice.

there are many things that make this incident infuriating:she was so arrogant when she cut in line against traffic. who gave her the confidence to be so arrogant? you must check her background. after such a long period of insults, humiliation and beatings, a veteran did not fight back at all, avoided the escalation of the conflict, and insisted on calling the police. this extraordinary patience is admirable, and it makes people feel extremely aggrieved for him! such a serious multiple violation of the law, disrupting traffic order, corrupting social atmosphere, and provoking trouble, the punishment is so light, which makes people feel indignant. why is the law so soft at this time? how can people who abide by the rules continue to be aggrieved.

in this situation full of humiliation and attack, a veteran insisted on not fighting back. with completely unequal physical conditions, he must have endured a lot of frustration for not fighting back even after being beaten like that. some people in the comment section said that he "has no blood", and this accusation makes no sense. first, such a heavy blow at this time may turn into a "mutual fight", and the reasonable will become unreasonable, and it will be distorted by people with ulterior motives as "a veteran beating a female driver". restraint and patience are not indulgence, but a helpless act of self-protection. second, fighting back may escalate the situation, and the law has extremely strict conditions for "legitimate defense". third,this is not a lack of "bloodiness", but rather a high-level and awe-inspiring "bloodiness". he controls his fists with absolute confidence that he can make the other party submit with one strike, avoids teaching her a lesson privately, and lets the public force of the law teach her a lesson severely.

regardless of whether the requirement of "not fighting back" is justified or the conditions set for "legitimate defense" are demanding, in any case, the way the veteran who "did not fight back" was dealt with at the time deserves respect. however, "not fighting back" is indeed frustrating. the person being beaten is extremely aggrieved, and the public who watched the scene and witnessed the facts from the video are also very aggrieved. insults and attacks carry a strong element of humiliation. fighting back is a human instinct, especially for those who have the absolute ability to fight back. it is too frustrating to control this instinct, and this is also a just frustration.how to eliminate this gap between "ordinary human instinct" and "legal rationality"? severe punishment and heavy penalties are necessary to relieve the huge frustration accumulated by "people's patience during the incident" with heavy penalties after the fact.

being frustrated is a huge internal consumption, a negative emotion of self-harm and self-attack. it is a mixture of grievance, helplessness, inward anger, and endurance. one has to endure and bear the contemptuous gazes of bystanders such as "why are you so useless?", "so heartless?", "you didn't even dare to fight back when being beaten by a woman". the requirement of "not fighting back when being beaten" is unreasonable and inhumane, and it is "anti-" here.but the rule of law naturally carries a control instinct to "avoid falling into the wild jungle", and rationally resists those human instincts that may exacerbate conflicts. what to do? a compensation mechanism is needed to turn "necessary frustration" into "patience can eventually exchange for justice". the key here is that the greater the frustration, the greater the punishment required to appease it. let people see that it is better to endure it. those who can't endure it will go to the right place.

this is the key reason why the counterintuitive and inhumane requirement of "not fighting back when beaten" will be reluctantly accepted by the public: i can endure it and not fight back, but the law must compensate me for all the grievances i have endured. i will not fight back personally and i believe in the law and public power. the law must be "heavy-handed."people applaud and feel happy, because their grievances have been redressed, and that bit of grievance may have been worth it.

the handling of this incident by the relevant departments in qingdao is obviously unacceptable. the veterans who were beaten cannot be calmed down, and the public opinion and the public cannot be calmed down. that's it? only 10 days of detention and a fine of 1,000 yuan? from the video, we can see that the person who cut in line against the flow was slapped at least 10 times and hit more than 40 times, leaving his nose and face swollen. going against the flow, cutting in line, insulting, beating, escaping, multiple violations added up, a typical case of provoking trouble, but only such a small punishment, which makes people suffer the greater grievance of "just bear it, let it go" after the frustration of "not fighting back". this is also the reason why the person who was beaten was indignant in front of the camera after bleeding, and he wanted justice.

take a step back and let breast hyperplasia and ovarian cysts be tolerated. people who abide by the rules should not be made to feel aggrieved. this incident is not just the aggrieved person, but a public aggrieved person. if reconciliation is not accepted, everyone is waiting for a follow-up in qingdao that can calm people's hearts. does she have any background? what supports her arrogance? who wants to make a big deal out of a small matter?"not fighting back when being beaten" is a double suffering of physical and mental depression. the just law has the obligation to calm people down and untie the knots in their hearts.