comment now｜forged "people's daily online article", why are the fans so bold?
2024-10-06
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
recently, actor xin yuxi broke the news that "qin xiaoxian of deyun club has cheated on her many times", which aroused the attention of netizens. on october 3, an article entitled "vulgar hype attracts attention, and it is not advisable to explode the "melon" culture" was maliciously speculated on the internet under the banner of "people's daily online". some netizens misinterpreted it as "people's daily online accused xin yuxi of making vulgar revelations" and "secretly supporting qin xiaoxian."
afterwards, xin yuxi revealed on weibo that this website was forged by the male fan. "it has touched the legal red line, and i have chosen to call the police as soon as possible." the people's daily online commentary also issued a solemn statement saying that the people's daily online did not publish this article and that it was a complete "deck" trick.
many netizens may not know or care about the rights and wrongs between qin xiaoxian and xin yuxi, or even don’t know who these two are. however, there are fans who forge “people’s daily online articles”, which is really surprising: the fan circle has already are you so bold?
on the one hand, some fans and rice circles have used counterfeit media as a new means to manipulate public opinion, calm public opinion, and seek benefits. the more authoritative, credible and influential a media is, the more likely it is that it will be targeted and used as a tool by some people with ulterior motives. this dangerous new trend deserves attention.
on the other hand, the average age of the current fan base is relatively young, including many minors. with a relative lack of legal knowledge and social experience, they may know the authority of people's daily online, but do not know the consequences of forging "people's daily online articles", so that they become hot-headed and take desperate risks.
recently, the cyberspace administration of china issued a notice, deploying a three-month special campaign of "cleaning up and rectifying illegal development of internet news information services" to focus on rectifying five types of outstanding problems. the first one to bear the brunt is "the compilation and distribution of false and untrue news information... malicious tampering, taking quotes out of context, piecing together and editing, synthesizing and fabricating news information to mislead the public."
some fans must be reminded that those who pretend to be media to fabricate news, spread false information or engage in vulgar hype are likely to violate the criminal law of defamation, picking quarrels and provoking trouble, fraud, etc. they will not only bear criminal liability, but may also face high fines. if it causes economic losses or mental harm to the media or the public, you must also bear civil liability for compensation.
it is also worth asking, are there any planners or organizers behind this? judging from past cases, chaos in the fandom appears to be the unconscious behavior of individual fans, but behind the scenes, "black hands" in the chain of interests cannot be ruled out. judging from the news, the fake article used the very misleading website address "society.people.com.cn.lblhky.com" in order to confuse the fake article with the real one. if he is really a minor who is not deeply involved in the world, i am afraid that he may not be able to do things so "professionally". therefore, we should not stop criticizing and condemning the forgery of "people's daily online articles", but should follow the clues to find out the truth.
the whole society has already reached a consensus on purifying the ecology of the fandom and correcting deformed star chasing, and many practical measures have been taken in all aspects. however, judging from the forged "people's daily online articles", the madness brought about by the fandom culture is still shocking. some netizens asked, "you dare to pretend to be people's daily online. what are you planning to do next?"
in this regard, this matter has gone beyond the scope of "eating melons". it not only touches the bottom line of law and public morality, but may also trigger a crisis of social trust and deteriorate the public opinion field. if authoritative media can be used as a tool for personal gain by fans, it will only make the cyberspace a mess, which is absolutely not allowed.
therefore, the fans involved should carefully consider the serious consequences of the crazy behavior of forging media articles; if there are organizers and planners behind it to confuse the public, they should also pay the price for their illegal behavior.
li qinyu, chief commentator of the paper
(this article is from the paper. for more original information, please download the “the paper” app)
