news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

recently, mr. shi, a hefei online car-hailing driver, refused to comply with the law enforcement orders of jiao, a transport manager in plain clothes, and his account was blocked by the platform, which attracted widespread attention. on september 24, the hefei municipal transportation bureau reported that jiao had engaged in improper law enforcement and was given a warning and removed from his post.

according to the video, on september 20, mr. shi, an online car-hailing driver, picked up a female passenger. before getting off the car, the passenger showed her law enforcement certificate and asked to see the driver's relevant documents. the driver said, "it takes two people to enforce the law" and "you are still enforcing the law in plain clothes, what are you thinking about." the woman in the back seat showed her law enforcement certificate, but after being rejected by the driver, she took it back angrily. then she threatened the driver: "let the platform check you!" after that, the online car-hailing driver went to the unit of the female passenger to seek an explanation and had an argument with the staff at the examination center of the transportation management department. the driver reiterated: "you can complain to the relevant departments, but you can't enforce the law alone, and you can't enforce the law in plain clothes." on september 22, the driver found that his online car-hailing platform account was blocked. the driver said that the customer service told him that "it was a work order issued by the government requesting the account to be blocked."

"let the platform check you!" the words were filled with arrogance from the inside out. the development of the incident was as magical as the "prophecy", and the driver was indeed blocked by the platform. with the blessing of power, can law enforcers enforce the law arbitrarily and recklessly? even the most basic law enforcement knowledge must be popularized by the masses, i am afraid that this law enforcer will be labeled as "unqualified".

on august 16, the fifth plenary meeting of the state council emphasized that efforts should be made to improve the level of legalization of government work. it was mentioned that administrative law enforcement should take maintaining the socialist market economic order as its fundamental goal, and that random inspections and fines should be stopped and corrected in a timely manner. one-man law enforcement, plainclothes law enforcement, and verbal threats not only expose the problem of improper law enforcement, but also expose the real existence of problems such as some grassroots law enforcement personnel or units relying on power, simple law enforcement, and profit-seeking law enforcement.

is there a causal relationship between the online car-hailing driver's refusal to enforce the law alone and the account being blocked? who instructed the platform? who handled the work order issued by the government requesting the account to be blocked? a series of questions must be investigated clearly. the authority of the law comes from the people's heartfelt support and conviction. the law enforcement behavior of the law enforcers themselves should be able to withstand compliance scrutiny. imagine that if the law enforcers themselves lack respect for the law, what qualifications do they have to ask the law enforcement objects to cooperate with the law enforcement? arbitrary law enforcement, brutal law enforcement, and profit-seeking law enforcement not only undermine the spirit of the rule of law, but also damage the legitimate rights and interests of market entities.

at present, under the general background of implementing the rule of law and creating a legal business environment, administrative law enforcement should aim to serve market entities. any improper law enforcement will erode the government's authority and credibility and dissolve the public's belief in the rule of law. the rule of law environment is also part of the business environment. what needs to be asked is whether the "one-man law enforcement, plainclothes law enforcement" traffic law enforcement chaos exposed this time is accidental or normal, is it an exception or a routine? in this matter, in addition to the staff involved, the objects to be investigated and held accountable should also be fully investigated and held accountable for the stubborn problems in traffic management law enforcement. only by pursuing all that should be done and implementing it can law enforcement behavior be given a standardized and professional "tight ring".