news

why was the worker fired from his post while the deputy director was only given a serious warning for drunk driving? officials disclose details of two drunk driving cases in anyang

2024-09-23

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

on september 21, the public account "qingfeng anyang" published "there are no exceptions to the accountability for drunk driving, and everyone is treated equally before the party discipline and national laws". on september 10, the anyang municipal commission for discipline inspection and supervision publicly reported two typical cases of drunk driving to the public, which triggered heated discussions among netizens. among them, malacca, a former staff member of the government of rengu town, tangyin county, and fan xiaodong, deputy captain (deputy director) of the long'an brigade (branch) of the anyang municipal urban management bureau, were both drunk driving. malacca was sentenced to two months of detention by the court and was dismissed from public office; fan xiaodong was given a serious warning within the party and a serious administrative record.

for both cases of drunk driving, the public servant malacca was fired from his public office, while the deputy captain (deputy director) fan xiaodong was only given a serious warning within the party and a serious administrative demerit. why did the two cases in the notice have such different results for both cases of "drunk driving"?

in this regard, the article explains that there are four main reasons:

first, the alcohol content is different. malacca's blood alcohol content was 195.34 mg/100 ml, and fan xiaodong's blood alcohol content was 108 mg/100 ml. both of them met the drunk driving standard of "blood alcohol content reaching 80 mg/100 ml or more" stipulated in article 4 of the "opinions on handling criminal cases of drunk driving" (effective from december 28, 2023, hereinafter referred to as the "2023 opinions"). however, fan xiaodong's alcohol content met the provisions of article 12 of the opinions that "blood alcohol content is less than 150 mg/100 ml", which can be identified as "significantly minor circumstances and little harm", while malacca has far exceeded the standard of 150 mg/100 ml.