news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

according to media reports, when the taiwan anti-corruption unit searched the home of former taipei mayor ke wenzhe, they found a usb flash drive with the words "2022/11/1 xiao shen 1500 shen qingjing" clearly written on it. some media interpreted it as "15 million yuan", while others thought it was the time point "15:00". a media reporter clearly stated on facebook that "on august 30, the anti-corruption unit searched ke wenzhe's home and seized a hard drive and a usb flash drive. we have exclusive information on it, and it clearly records (weijing group boss) shen qingjing 15 million yuan."

in this regard, former legislator guo zhengliang questioned on the 9th, "the media had exclusive access to the information on august 30? are they more powerful than the judge? can the prosecutors keep the usb drive from the court? when the court made the ruling, was the usb drive handed over? the usb drive was there on august 30, why was it not handed over to the court? why didn't the taipei district prosecutor's office hand over the evidence to the taipei district court? should this matter be handled?

guo zhengliang said frankly that it is because no money has been found that people think the crime of profiteering is too abstract, so they are discussing it now. otherwise, what is there to discuss? for example, no dpp member spoke up for former taoyuan mayor zheng wencan.

guo zhengliang emphasized that the key point is that the reporter wrote that he saw the contents of the usb flash drive on august 30, when the taipei district court had not yet held a detention hearing. is there such a way to handle a case? this reporter's revelation killed himself, and the taipei prosecutor's informant is ready to be finished! killing a lot of people!

in addition, taipei city councillor hou hanting of the new party said on the 9th that the people's party should sue the taipei prosecutors office for the crime of profiteering, because the taipei prosecutors office also knew that it was illegal and violated the principle of non-disclosure of investigations, but profited from certain media outlets, allowing them to gain widespread benefits. now that the report has been exposed, it has indeed gained traffic. if the people's party wants to turn defense into offense, it can sue the taipei prosecutors office for the crime of profiteering.

lin jingxian, taiwan correspondent of strait herald