한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

introduction:

1. the wife of the driver involved stated that the responsibility for the child’s death cannot be entirely attributed to my family, and questioned “where was the cyclist who didn’t knock the child over at the time?”

2. the driver himself did not admit the charges. his relatives said that the driver's family tried their best to raise 200,000 yuan, hoping to compensate the family of the deceased, but the money was eventually returned.

3. the attorney representing the case said that there are three core points worth considering in this case, namely, the jurisdiction of the case, the division of responsibilities and evidence collection, and the intervening factors and causal relationships.

4. regarding the fact that the section of the road where the accident occurred was not allowed to be passed, the family members said that jiang had no idea at all. "that was the road that jiang took to go to work. he could drive directly from the village to this section of road. there was no sign on that section of road in their village." the family members said that this section of road had been repaired for 2 or 3 years, and there were many cars passing through it normally.

[information from red star news, dahe daily, da'an news, morning news]

on august 11, the incident of "a child in hebei province fell off his bicycle and was crushed to death by an oncoming car" sparked widespread discussion; on august 22, the media reported that the driver involved and the child's family failed to reach an agreement, the traffic police did not issue a responsibility determination letter, and the case had been transferred to the procuratorate; on september 3, a red star news reporter learned from the relatives of the driver involved that the driver, jiang, had been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter.