news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

summary:Put yourself in their shoes. Isn't it a form of abuse to take away, lock up, and teach a child over one year old? Yes, children crying in public spaces can be annoying, but this is a child's instinct. Tolerating, being patient, and "benignly ignoring" this unavoidable crying is the kindness a society should have. Everyone has experienced crying as a child. No one didn't cry when they were young, especially when they were around one year old. It's instinct. From the news, whether it's on a high-speed train or an airplane, sophisticated adults seem to be increasingly intolerant of the sounds made by young children. What I want to ask is, at what age does this society allow young children to cry?

Really, are you so delicate, fragile, and domineering that you can't even tolerate the crying of a one-year-old child?When I saw this infuriating news, the comments burst out from the fire at the same time.

Everyone has seen the news, and the video was posted by the person involved. They may have thought of themselves as heroes who are willing to help others and help others raise children during the journey, and they are waiting for everyone to like the video after posting it. The person involved posted a video saying: Grandma took her one-year-old granddaughter on the plane, and the child kept crying. Many people blocked their ears with tissues, and some people went to the back row to hide. Everyone's "protest" had little effect, so she and another aunt took the child from the grandmother and took him to the airplane toilet to "set rules": when you don't cry for 3 consecutive minutes, you will be taken out to find your grandmother. Afterwards, the child didn't cry for more than 2 hours, and later they had breakfast together and were happy.

This is the description of the person involved who "claimed to be a good person and did good deeds", but it aroused public anger. Taking such a young child away from his relatives, locking him in a confined space, and accepting two strangers' "rules", how terrified would this make the child! - Many netizens called the police, and the person involved deleted the video. The relevant department responded that because the two women's behavior of taking care of the child had been agreed by the child's grandparents, the police verbally educated the child's grandparents and informed the child's parents of the relevant situation, and did not take further action against the two strange women. This treatment further aroused dissatisfaction,Can this kind of "consent" be considered consent? Why are there so many people who are ignorant of the law? This seriously violates the laws and regulations on the protection of minors. In some countries, this so-called "rule-making" behavior will be prosecuted, and the relatives who "agreed" will be deprived of custody, and the "strangers who set the rules" will be held accountable for child abuse.

Put yourself in their shoes. Isn't it a form of abuse to take away, lock up, and teach a child over one year old? Yes, crying children in public spaces can be annoying, but this is a child's instinct. Tolerating, being patient, and "benignly ignoring" this unavoidable crying is the kindness a society should have. Everyone has experienced crying children. No one didn't cry when they were young, especially when they were about one year old. It's instinct. From the news, whether it's a high-speed train or an airplane,Sophisticated adults seem to be becoming increasingly intolerant of the noises made by young children. What I want to ask is, at what age does this society allow young children to cry?

How to "set rules" for children around one year old? Crying is their instinct. The police will arrest you and will not let you see your grandmother unless you stop crying. To forbid their crying by intimidation is to "preserve the natural law of adults and destroy the human desires of minors", which is obviously abuse.No wonder some people say that the last time they saw such a situation, it was school bullying. I feel right, isn't this a kind of bullying, taking advantage of the fact that young children have no resistance, other passengers' moral blackmail, grandparents have no ability to protect their granddaughter, and locked the child in the toilet, typical physical and mental bullying.

Children cry on airplanes for no reason. They are not "unruly". They are afraid of the unfamiliar environment or they are physically uncomfortable due to cabin pressure. At this time, we need to switch to the child's perspective. For such young children, we cannot switch to the adult's perspective of quietness. They cannot do it. We can only let adults switch to the child's perspective. I saw a video a few days ago and was very touched. This perspective is too unfamiliar. The title is"Why do children need to be held by adults when they go out?" People generally think that it is because children are spoiled and have developed the habit of being held. In fact, it is not. This is only the perspective of adults. What about the perspective of children? This video restores the perspective of children. A video camera is placed on the child to let us see what the child sees when he goes out. It is always dark, low, the road surface, the legs of adults, the legs of densely packed people, and the unfamiliar bottom. Only when an adult holds her can she see familiar scenes, people's smiling faces, open spaces, and friendly interfaces.

So, she needs to be hugged, comforted, and see familiar sights.

This "angle" made me cry. We are too used to our own angles, taking everything for granted, thinking that children are too delicate and that they should not be spoiled too much. But what do they really see? What does the so-called "consent" of adults mean to them? Her ears hurt when she took off, she was afraid of the unfamiliar environment, and she cried instinctively, but the adults could not understand and thought she was annoying. They took her away from her relatives and locked her in the toilet to teach her a lesson. She was so scared that she dared not cry, and was considered to have "rules". Aren't such adults shameless?

Our public transportation spaces seem to be becoming less and less inclusive to children.The so-called "rights awareness" and "power boundary awareness" have increased. Such rights and power boundaries are only power boundaries from the perspective of adults. They do not leave room for minors, especially children. It is natural for children to cry, but at the same time, they have the right to access public transportation space.At this time, tolerance and patience are needed. Such shameless "rules" are just a small episode in the journey for the people on the plane, but for a child, the childhood trauma and the terrible experience of being lectured by a stranger in a closed toilet may affect his life.

You can be sophisticated, but you can't be child-hating or ignorant of the law. You can have your own boundaries, but you should also leave some space for the rights of minors and young children.Yes, you are not the child’s parent and you don’t need to “spoil” him or her, but you have your own childhood and will eventually become a parent.