news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the school's service department and canteen all use facial recognition systems for consumption, otherwise it will affect students' normal life on campus. recently, a parent of a student at the xianhai campus of dongchen senior high school in mianyang, sichuan, complained that the school uses facial recognition for consumption on campus. it not only forces students to apply for a facial recognition coordination account, but also requires each student to pay a platform service fee of 150 yuan per year.

the paper noted that the social development bureau of xianhai district, mianyang city later stated in a response to the sichuan political network platform that the fee for the face-scanning system is based on the campus communication card that parents voluntarily apply for. if they do not apply for a number card, no fees will be charged. , students can use their faces to make purchases normally on campus.

the parent said that face recognition is used to make purchases in the school cafeteria and on-campus canteens, and students must enable face recognition. moreover, each student needs to pay a platform service fee of 150 yuan per year. i don’t understand why schools in mianyang continue to charge smart campus service platform function fees. this parent hopes that the relevant departments in mianyang will investigate and stop it.

on september 14, 2024, the xianhai district social development bureau stated that it conducted an investigation at the school and found that the face-swiping consumption system in the school canteen and living service center was opened free of charge, and the school did not charge separate fees. according to the platform, the fees for the face-swiping system are based on the campus communication card that parents voluntarily apply for. if they do not apply for a number card, no fees will be charged. students can use their faces to make purchases normally on campus.

the parent was dissatisfied with the above reply, saying that the school teacher clearly informed parents in the home school group that if they did not pay as soon as possible, it would affect their children's normal consumption in the school cafeteria, etc., and they would be responsible for the consequences. if they were not worried that their children would not be able to eat normally, no parent would be willing to pay. it is not a voluntary act as stated above by the department.

on september 21, the bureau responded to the above content again, and stated in the reply that after the social development bureau contacted the parents of the students and communicated by phone on september 20, the parents expressed satisfaction with the policy explanation.