news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

acting consciously, admitting responsibility after the fact, and making compensation according to the price are the basic requirements within the scope of legal theory and are the key to resolving disputes.

on september 28, in jiangmen, guangdong, after a delivery boy accidentally collided with a mercedes-benz twice, he took the initiative to pay only 2,100 yuan in compensation. when the car owner learned that the delivery boy was getting married this year, he offered not to pay compensation and said with a smile that he could just call him for the wedding. he also said that he also works part-time and it is not easy to make money. if he can, he should try not to care about it. this video has won a lot of likes on the internet, which is enough to show what the world's people want.

taking the initiative to compensate for damage to someone else's car is a sign of responsibility and duty; taking the initiative to give up compensation is a sign of generosity and magnanimity.in the atmosphere of calmness and mutual understanding, the shock caused by a street accident disappeared. the two have evolved from "contradictory" parties to sympathetic "comrades", demonstrating a benign and rational way of handling street disputes.

controversies on the streets are commonplace. they would scold and fight at the slightest disagreement, and all the scenes were amazing. you and i are both "passers-by". even if there is a little conflict "on the road", it is just a coincidence. take the aforementioned incident as an example. the "unintentional harm" caused by the takeaway boy's mistake and confusion was the source of this incident. obviously,this incident was about "tying" two strangers together in an extremely accidental situation. and on the premise that no one has any ill intentions, the conflict can be resolved by talking to each other well.the hardships of the delivery boy's hard work outside and the joy of preparing to get married were therefore felt by "brother benz" and he was praised by others. this led to the emotion that "it is not easy for everyone" and the finale of "turning hostility into friendship".

such narratives are not uncommon in recent years. in may 2024, on the streets of laixi, qingdao, a high school student accidentally broke the rearview mirror of the car on the roadside while riding a bicycle on the street. because there was no phone number left in the car, he and his classmates left a piece of paper with their contact information after waiting for the owner for a long time to no avail. finally, his classmate met with the car owner to resolve the rearview mirror problem. in order to praise the children for their courage and integrity, the car owner paid part of the rearview mirror repair costs out of his own pocket, and even posted a video to like them.

in october 2023, in hangzhou, a primary school student accidentally scratched a private car, left 50 yuan, wrote a note to apologize and offered to pay in installments. later, the car owner said he would accept 50 yuan, and then rewarded the 50 yuan to the children involved who had the courage to take responsibility. after the incident spread on the internet, it attracted a lot of praise.

in all fairness, emotional outbursts caused by damage to property are a normal human response. the aforementioned qingdao car owner said bluntly that his "head was buzzing" the moment he saw the damage to his car. at this time, if you encounter an unreasonable perpetrator, or no one acknowledges the fault at all, you can imagine the car owner's anger and the turn of events.

in social life, it is not terrible to have disputes. abiding by one's duty should not allow disputes to spread or intensify. what is terrible is to avoid one's responsibilities or even make unreasonable troubles.not long ago, i was driving on the road when a minivan suddenly forced a lane change on a solid line. the distance was too close and i had no time to react. my car rear-ended me and a piece of paint was scratched. the other party was driving a small bag of bread to deliver the goods, and i was covered in sweat. i thought to myself that it would not be easy for them, and since the paint damage was not large, i would not let the other party pay compensation. unexpectedly, the other car owner was so rude that he blamed me for not letting him stop, "you did it on purpose!" this evil person's attitude of complaining first and confusing right and wrong instantly angered me. so, choose to keep things official. later, the traffic police determined that he was fully responsible.

there is nothing wrong in the world, and it is only for mediocre people to disturb themselves. this phrase is very suitable for use in some interpersonal disputes. it is not easy for anyone to compare their hearts with others, but this is not a reason to act willfully and kidnap public and private morality.

by extension, we cannot expect everyone to "waive the bill" for the perpetrator, let alone think that others "should let me go." after all, acting consciously, admitting responsibility after the fact, and making compensation according to the price are the basic requirements within the scope of legal theory and are the key to resolving disputes.

anyway,all parties in interpersonal conflicts should abide by boundaries and be rational and tolerant at all times. only in this way can they get out of the predicament and usher in a "everyone is happy" context.

red star news special commentator wu lichuan