news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

seeing that the war between israel and hezbollah was about to break out, the u.s. pentagon gritted its teeth and sent another aircraft carrier to the middle east. but when i was searching for relevant information, i discovered a very interesting detail.

as we all know, the middle east plays a special role in the global strategy of the united states. in order to ensure control of the situation in the middle east, the us military maintains one or two aircraft carriers deployed near the middle east all year round. in the early days of the palestinian-israeli conflict, the most recent aircraft carrier in the united states was the ford-class first ship. the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier uss ford, and later the uss eisenhower was dispatched to support, which was followed by houthi armed attacks on merchant ships.

in order to demonstrate the strength of the united states, the eisenhower received an order from the u.s. government to pass through the suez canal and reach the red sea to escort passing merchant ships related to israel.

after nearly 275 days of deployment and launching nearly 500 missiles of various types, the eisenhower finally ended its deployment and returned to its home port in july. the replacement for the eisenhower was the uss theodore roosevelt. interestingly, after the roosevelt was discovered passing through the strait of malacca and entering the indian ocean on july 7, the roosevelt was not deployed in the red sea like the eisenhower, but stationed in the gulf of oman, although this is also the middle east and an important choke point in the gulf region, the houthis' attacks on merchant ships have not stopped. logically speaking, shouldn't the roosevelt go to the red sea to demonstrate the strength of the us military? ? this is very suspicious.