news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

after the federal reserve cut interest rates, funds returned and the market began to stabilize and rebound. whether we can eat meat this year depends on this wave of market conditions.

however, judging from the current situation, the market is severely divided. on the one hand, individual stocks have fallen after the index rebounded, and on the other hand, the money-making effect of demon stocks has soared. after huaqiang stepped out of the space in the early stage, the recent national reform and xinchuang have successfully inherited the money-making effect. this is a typical case of choosing the meat in the right direction and the noodles in the wrong direction.

if you don't know the next direction, you can take a look at the operations of fang daxia, the top player in the circle. even in such a difficult market this year, he still made excess returns.not to mention the distance, just take his recent participation in changshan bm and long gao gf, leading fans to eat meat that exceeds 53cm.

after changshan bm took profit, his other short-term drifts were also very stable, all of which were preemptive measures.you can click on the business card below to follow his operations, and i sincerely recommend him.

text

you must have seen a lot of anti-japanese dramas. the reason why they are called dramas is that they are full of errors and omissions, even to the point of being very bizarre.

of course, some film and television dramas are shot seriously in the direction of trying to stay close to history. unfortunately, such films and television dramas are either completely wrong in showing the common actions of the japanese army, or they are decent in one shot but wrong in the next. outrageous.

serious drama?

first question:

what were the marching movements of the japanese army during world war ii?

in some dramas, the japanese army marched with guns strutting on their backs.

in order to show the director's skill, some dramas pretended to inadvertently sweep across a corner of the battlefield, and asked the japanese soldiers who were off alert to put their guns on their backs and start marching.

have these crews ever thought about whether the japanese can really carry a gun behind their back?

according to japanese historical materials "army wing overview", the height standard for japanese soldiers at that time was 1.52 meters or more to qualify.

let's look at the "38 cover" of the common rifles of the japanese army. the total length of the 38-type rifle is 1276 mm, which is nearly 1.3 meters. after the bayonet is installed, the total length is 1663 mm, which is about 1.66 meters.

the 1.52 meter japanese soldier carried the 38 big cover on his back?

the result of forcibly carrying it is that the butt of the gun is stuck directly on the ground. how can you walk like this?

the "japanese army infantry drill code" also has regulations.

the second section of the first chapter is called carrying the gun (carrying the gun), setting up the gun (standing the gun), and marching (marching).

you see, there are no rules for carrying a gun.

when marching, you are required to carry a gun. the specific action is to hold the rifle with your right hand and carry the gun on your right shoulder.

marching with guns

therefore, if you see japanese troops marching with guns behind their backs and holding guns in both hands in war movies, it only means that the crew does not understand military history.

explain the gun again.

the general movement is to hold the gun with your right hand and the rifle is vertical to the ground.

it's a very simple action and very labor-saving, but you can't see this shot in many movies and tv series.

second question:

enemy contact actions and alerts.

needless to say, many of the dramas are just as you wish.

in some drama-oriented movies and tv dramas, in scenes where the japanese may encounter our anti-japanese soldiers and civilians, each one holds a rifle or holds the gun with both hands, and even raises the rifle and advances with an aiming posture.

this kind of action may be considered a good tactical skill in the modern army, but unfortunately, it is completely inconsistent with history.

the japanese army during world war ii was not like this at all.

it’s still the second section of the second chapter of the "japanese army infantry drill code", called sports, the connection between sports and shooting (the connection between sports, sports and shooting)

general essentials:

put the ruler down, hold the gun in your right hand, withdraw the bullet from the chamber (incidentally, later instructions no longer require the bullet to be withdrawn), and move forward quickly with the gun in hand.

let's recall, in recent film and television dramas, how many of the characters playing japanese troops have tactical actions that meet this requirement?

only occasionally in a few film and television dramas, the actor playing the role of the japanese soldier holds a rifle in his right hand and moves forward quickly in a low posture. however, in the next shot of this kind of film and television drama, the rifle is slung on his back, which makes people laugh and cry.

in fact, if you look through historical photos, you will find that the japanese army really carried the gun in the right hand during attacks and rapid movements, including street fighting.

japanese offensive historical photos

for example, the picture above is.

in addition, there is another detail in the picture above. the japanese soldier close to the camera should be holding a submachine gun. he did not raise the submachine gun to aim like most movies and tv dramas nowadays. instead, he held the submachine gun with one hand. waist.

some people may say that this is suspected of being staged.

the posing also needs to show tactical movements. how can you achieve the purpose of publicity by posing casually?

the rifles of that era were heavy and long. if they were held high for a long time to aim like in the movies and tv series, would the human body be able to support it?

at such a close distance, do you still need to raise the gun and aim accurately?

regarding this point, if you look at historical photos, you will find that the alert posture of the japanese army in battle is definitely not like this, such as the picture below:

historical photos of japanese street fighting

it was easy to see that they all carried their rifles at their waists or in their hands and waited until they saw the target before shooting.

by the way, it can also be seen here that the heavy machine gun firing range and the infantry's planned offensive route are completely separate.

if it's like in war movies, the infantry are charging in front, and the light and heavy machine guns are firing behind them.

there was no need to fight. all our own infantry were killed by our own machine gun fire.

of course, i’m not all talking about domestic anti-japanese film and television dramas. in fact, western film and television dramas are almost the same.

from the end of world war ii to about the 1980s, there were bad movies.

there are still many war movies with rigorous tactical action.

therefore, some viewers should not be cynical about old movies. in "old three wars", actions such as opening the rifle scale, holding the gun with one hand, and raising the gun to the shoulder do not require close-ups at all, just like eating and drinking. nature.

moreover, the crews of some film and television dramas related to the anti-japanese war are very knowledgeable, but they are just fishing.

for example, they deliberately placed a certain japanese military music at the beginning of the movie and asked the japanese marines to play it.

then many crews imitated it, but this military music belongs to the navy, not the army. the uniforms of the japanese marine corps are just a bit like the japanese army, and the two are not the same thing at all.

as for some of the details captured by this knowledgeable crew, the directors who imitated them in their film and television dramas simply couldn't see it, and imitation was out of the question.

they are probably looking at the horse riding characters.

the reason, i can only reluctantly speculate, is that when these war films were made, not only it was easy to find military directors who had participated in the battle, but also among the actors, there were veterans who had participated in the war, and even those who had participated in the current filming subject. military veteran.

nowadays, even if the military director you find understands, he only understands current tactical movements, which has nothing to do with the anti-japanese war period. the more standard the actor's performance is, the more outrageous his mistakes will be.