zhang jie's studio apologizes: please don't bother the owner anymore
2024-09-11
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
on the evening of september 9, @张杰工作室 posted: during the stage interaction at zhang jie's fuzhou concert on september 6, mr. zhang jie mentioned a number that we had not verified in advance, which caused trouble and distress to the owner of the phone. this is a major oversight and mistake in our work, and we are deeply sorry. since that day, we have been actively contacting the owner of the phone, hoping to have the opportunity to apologize directly. we have made initial progress tonight and are currently negotiating a solution. here, we humbly accept everyone's criticism and corrections, and will do our best to make remedial measures. at the same time, we also implore everyone not to bother the owner of the phone again. once again, we sincerely apologize to the owner of the phone and everyone who cares about this matter!
according to previous reports, recently, some netizens broke the news that zhang jie casually reported a string of numbers at the fuzhou concert, including his birthday, and said it was "my phone number", which attracted many fans to call this number. as a result, zhang jie himself may not have thought that this "casual phone number" actually exists and the owner is from shanghai. some media reported that the owner of the phone, who is suspected to be an amateur, has been forced to turn off his phone due to a large number of strange calls in a short period of time. the paper tried to call this legendary number on the evening of september 9, and the familiar voice of the female operator came from the microphone: "hello, the phone you dialed is turned off." this shows that this number is a real number, and the owner really doesn't want to be disturbed. for this sudden situation of "mobile phone number accidentally leaked and receiving a large number of strange calls", can it be technically restricted? in addition to being forced to choose to turn off the phone, is there any other way to prevent the owner from being disturbed too much?
in this regard, a staff member of a shanghai operator told reporters that technically, the operator has no way or means to block normal incoming calls, nor can it stop normal incoming calls, because the backend has no way to determine whether these calls are normal calls or illegal calls. moreover, the backend cannot see how many strange calls "flooded" in a short period of time, "because only when the owner answers the call and generates billing, the backend can see and record the call number and duration, and the number of unanswered calls cannot be seen by the backend." the staff member said that as for how many calls were answered during the period, it is not convenient to disclose because it involves user privacy.
the reporter of the paper learned from the shanghai communications administration and the operator that the mobile phone number is still in normal status, just turned off, not shut down. the operator said that it has not contacted the owner of the phone, and the owner has not sought help from the operator.
according to relevant media reports, yu long, director of the intellectual property professional committee of beijing weiheng (chengdu) law firm, said that according to the provisions of the civil code of the people's republic of china, mobile phone numbers belong to the category of personal privacy and are protected by law. without the consent of the right holder, the unauthorized use, disclosure or disclosure of their mobile phone number may constitute an infringement of the right to privacy. article 1,032 of the civil code of the people's republic of china stipulates that natural persons enjoy the right to privacy. no organization or individual may infringe upon the privacy rights of others by means of spying, intrusion, disclosure, or disclosure, but it can also be seen that zhang jie's behavior was not to intentionally disturb the peace of others' lives, but to be careless when playing with the stalk, causing damage to others. therefore, as the organizer, a statement should be issued in a timely manner to clarify the facts to avoid the expansion of the damage to others' privacy rights.
lawyer zhou zhaocheng of beijing anjian law firm believes that zhang jie reported a string of numbers at the concert, which may have been intended to be a joke or to interact with fans. if the mobile phone number is not owned by zhang jie's team, although zhang jie may not have subjective malice, his behavior objectively caused the privacy rights of others to be damaged, which may be considered an infringement. (the paper)
source: morning news
