news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

jimu news commentator qu jing

on august 28, near the qingshan village observation deck in laoshan district, qingdao, a woman named wang tried to cut in line in the opposite direction but failed, so she beat up a driver named lin who was driving normally in the opposite direction, causing bleeding from his mouth and nose. on the 29th, the local police issued a notice that wang was administratively detained for 10 days and fined 1,000 yuan. at 13:07 on the afternoon of september 3, the qingdao public security wechat official account issued another notice, responding to the online rumors of "hit-and-run, traffic violations not investigated and dealt with", "home detention", and the identity of the man in black in the on-site video.

according to the police report and the comprehensive investigation of the case, the case was caused by a traffic dispute and did not meet the constituent elements of provoking disturbances in the relevant laws. the traffic management department of the public security organ imposed an administrative penalty of 200 yuan on wang for driving against the flow of traffic and deducted three points from his driver's license. regarding the traffic accident, after the two parties reached an agreement through negotiation, wang drove away from the scene and did not constitute a hit-and-run. in other words, in addition to the detention and fine reported earlier, the female driver was also fined for her traffic violations, but she would not be "held criminally responsible" as many netizens expected.

screenshot of the online video of the "qingdao land rover female driver" incident

judging from the police investigation, wang's illegal behavior is not very serious, but this incident has attracted strong attention and caused countless netizens to condemn it because her behavior is indeed too arrogant and overbearing, exceeding the limit of public tolerance. people see in her some people's arrogant provocation of the law, wanton bullying of others, and ruthless trampling of social rules. everyone will naturally think, if it is not someone with a backstage or background, how dare he be so arrogant? therefore, it is difficult to get a fair and just handling of the incident.

in addition, the speed of official detailed notifications is far behind the speed of public opinion diffusion. various fabricated rumors and hot topics continue to stimulate public sentiment, so it is easy for the public opinion field to overreact and it is difficult to maintain the boundaries of speech and behavior. this also reminds all relevant departments to be good at observing and responding to public opinion, especially for public events that have a lot of public feedback and opinions, to speed up the response, improve the notification mechanism, and take positive actions to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and anxiety.

judging from this incident, the public's strong reaction is actually a call and expectation for social fairness and justice. lin did not fight back even though his mouth and nose were bleeding, which triggered heated discussions about the common saying that "fighting back is fighting back". in addition to hoping to restore the truth of the incident and let wang, who ignored the law, suffer the consequences, everyone is also eager to know, if they encounter similar incidents, will it be considered fighting back as long as they fight back? what exactly is reasonable and appropriate self-defense to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of themselves and those around them?

the law cannot give in to illegality, and justice cannot bow to injustice. the police's notice brought the handling of this incident to an end, but the impact of the incident on people's inner confidence in the rule of law and sense of security is still residual. various "bumps" and conflicts in life are inevitable. if you encounter someone like "wang", how can you deal with it to protect yourself and avoid legal risks? i hope that laws and regulations can be further improved and popularized, accurately distinguish between self-defense and intentional injury of mutual fighting, so that everyone knows clearly what to do and what can be done, and give the law authority, the public confidence, and justice armor in the handling of specific cases.