news

Today we will talk about cognitive warfare and the intensity of the game in the military field.

On the surface, it seems that cognitive warfare is not important, just a kind of propaganda or guidance of public opinion. But in fact, the effect it produces is very huge. For example, Iran and Israel are now in a fierce military confrontation, or this kind of confrontation and contradiction is escalating. Because Israel assassinated Haniyeh, a leading figure of Hamas who came to congratulate in Tehran, the capital of Iran, this is an infringement on Iran's sovereignty and a smear on Iran's image. Of course, it is also a serious military provocation against Iran.

After this incident, Western reports said that a few months ago, Israeli intelligence had already placed a remote-controlled bomb in the room where Haniyeh was going to stay. It was only after Haniyeh arrived that the bomb was detonated by remote control from outside, such as a robot or some other remote control method, and Haniyeh was killed.

This shows that the Israeli intelligence department is omnipotent. But let's think about it again. Haniyeh came to Tehran to attend the inauguration ceremony of President Pezeshiziyan. The ceremony of President Pezeshiziyan was because President Lehi had an accident in his helicopter crashing into the mountain. Then a new president was elected about a month later. He became president in this way. According to reports in the Western media, the bomb was buried here a few months ago. So a few months ago, Israel predicted that President Lehi's helicopter would crash into the mountain, and Pezeshiziyan would take over as president. Then, Haniyeh would come here to celebrate the event and live in this room? That's really omnipotent. If so, why didn't he do it earlier? Because the attack on Hamas and Israel's kidnapping of hostages happened on October 7, October 7 last year. How could he not have expected it? Right. So he is sure that for propaganda, Israeli agents are omnipotent.

Then there is another theory that the time bomb was not planted a few months ago, but was instigated by Israeli agents, two Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard officers, and then they were asked to implement it. In fact, the time bomb was similar to a brick, and they brought it into the guesthouse or hotel where Haniya lived. Because they were members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, no one checked, so they put such ammunition, or this explosive, in Haniya's room, and then it was detonated. But the two of them had already taken the money and seemed to have fled to Northern Europe.

Then let's look at the assassinations or attacks carried out by Israel in the past. They were not carried out by officers, but by two people working together. They usually used fake waiter identities or maintenance workers, because when they entered the room, they would not be noticed, because they were going to clean the room, or they were going to repair the damaged lamps, or the water pipes were blocked. They were doing this, which was the least noticeable and most likely to succeed. Moreover, they might send two people who did not know each other to place bombs in the room, and the two people arranged each other, which would increase their success rate. Now, if they find two officers to place the explosives in the room, it would be easy to be exposed, or it would be difficult to succeed, because it would attract other people's attention. Therefore, we can see that the release of these messages is a kind of cognitive warfare, which is to give the outside world a wrong message or wrong news, so that you make a wrong judgment, thinking that the Israeli intelligence department is omnipotent, including its intention to provoke internal conflicts in Iran.

Of course, Iran itself has also released news or statements, explained this matter, and investigated it, so it knows who did it and how they achieved their goals. As for its own loopholes, as for how it will plug these loopholes in the future, that is Iran's business. But since it dares to say that it will retaliate against Israel militarily, it means that it has solid evidence to prove that this incident was Israel's doing. Otherwise, what basis do you have to retaliate against Israel militarily? So we see that while military actions are in progress, this kind of cognitive warfare has always been accompanying them.