news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

recently, there have been some important news in the world.

news 1: should china bear responsibility?

according to a report by hunan daily citing reuters, ukrainian president zelensky said in a video speech not long ago that the key to whether the two-and-a-half-year-old russia-ukraine conflict can end lies in whether ukraine’s western allies are determined to provide ukraine with required weapons and allowed to use them. according to reports, zelensky pointed out that the talks to be held in the united states next week are of great significance to ensuring ukraine's defense capabilities.

in this complex international game, the upcoming us election is undoubtedly an important indicator. imagine if ukraine could end the conflict quickly before the election. what would be the impact? not only can it reduce losses, but it can also lay a solid foundation for future counterattacks. in fact, ukraine's military capabilities are increasing day by day with the support of western countries. a new round of weapons and equipment assistance is about to arrive, which will undoubtedly improve ukraine's combat performance on the battlefield.

the conflict between russia and ukraine has lasted for nearly three years, and kiev and moscow have recently expressed their willingness for peace talks at the same time, which is very rare in the current situation. according to a report by shangguan news some time ago, igor novkva, director of the ukrainian presidential office, revealed that ukraine plans to propose a peaceful solution to the conflict and will transfer the plan through a third country with ties to russia, rather than contact russia directly. previously, russian president vladimir putin also expressed his willingness to start peace talks with ukraine and called on china, india, brazil and other countries to play a mediating role in the russia-ukraine conflict.

news 2: the ministry of national defense issued a stern warning and will not show mercy!

according to the website of the ministry of national defense, some time ago, the spokesperson of the ministry of national defense, colonel zhang xiaogang, answered reporters’ questions. in response to the recent statement issued by the us military's indo-pacific headquarters, which urged china to review dangerous, coercive and potentially escalating strategies in the south china sea and other areas, colonel zhang xiaogang said that the united states and its allies and partners are the ones creating insecurity risks. main factors. he pointed out that u.s. ships and aircraft frequently come to china's sea and airspace to cause nuisance and provocation, illegally intrude into china's territorial waters or jurisdictional waters and airspace, and maliciously interfere with china's normal exercises and training activities. this irresponsible and dangerous operation not only seriously damages china's sovereignty and security interests, but also poses a serious threat to the safety of personnel on both sides, while undermining regional peace and stability.

the united states has long been hostile to china. at a hearing of the u.s. house of representatives foreign affairs committee, deputy secretary of state campbell said that due to china's cooperation with russia in the field of defense, the united states needs to further strengthen sanctions on china. campbell pointed out that almost all sanctions aimed at curbing sino-russian defense cooperation have taken effect, but more actions need to be taken in the future. previously, the united states had included more than 60 russian legal entities, 42 chinese organizations, and 11 iranian organizations on the export control list. the goal of american politicians is very clear, which is to try their best to contain the rise of china.

the united states has always regarded china as its main strategic rival, and this attitude continues to this day. however, burns, the current u.s. ambassador to china, recently called china a "systemic enemy," a statement that clearly carries a confrontational tone. this view shows that burns's understanding of sino-us relations is biased. in fact, sino-us relations are one of the most important bilateral relations in the world today. if the united states attempts to impose its ideology on china, it will undoubtedly be a manifestation of hegemonism. this policy is not only wrong, it is dangerous. china and the united states can engage in healthy competition in various fields, instead of using the united states to unilaterally contain and suppress china.

news 3: north korea publicly expressed its strong dissatisfaction

according to the "global times" report, not long ago, the "quadrilateral security dialogue" leaders' summit of the united states, japan, india and australia was held in wilmington, delaware, the hometown of us president biden. cnn pointed out that this meeting was a "last effort" to leave a legacy for biden's foreign policy as he faced the transfer of power, and was intended to "check and balance china's growing influence." in addition, some media reporters recorded through cameras that the first topic of the summit was targeting china. although china was not mentioned in the joint statement issued by the summit, agence france-presse quoted a us official as saying that "confronting china" has become the "key agenda" of the summit.

the quad mechanism is a typical embodiment of the biden administration’s foreign policy of “minilateralism”. biden made it clear in the early days of taking office that the core of his china policy is to shape the strategic environment around china, that is, by uniting allies and non-allies in the asia-pacific region to establish various "small groups" and "small circles" to achieve control over china. strategic encirclement. in addition to the quad mechanism, in recent years the united states has successively established multiple trilateral mechanisms such as the united states, japan and south korea, the united states, japan and the philippines, the united states, japan and australia, and the united states, the united kingdom and australia. however, these exclusive “small circles” not only have multiple overlaps, but also face the common problem of “focusing on issues but not on constraints.”

in addition, the four countries jointly issued the wilmington declaration, in which they condemned north korea's development of nuclear weapons and continued ballistic missile tests and reiterated their support for the complete denuclearization of the korean peninsula. in response, the spokesperson of the north korean ministry of foreign affairs, in a statement issued through the korean central news agency today, strongly condemned the actions of the quadrilateral security dialogue and believed that it violated north korea's autonomy and development rights. the north korean spokesperson pointed out that this behavior nakedly reveals the intention to create confrontation and confrontation through the most hostile means, and believes that the quadrilateral security dialogue is a reflection of the us cold war mentality and camp confrontation policy, and serves the implementation of the us unipolar world strategy. political and diplomatic tool.