news

israel’s attack on iran is imminent

2024-10-06

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

israel's attack on iran is imminent.

on the evening of october 5, israeli prime minister netanyahu vowed:we have an obligation to respond to iran—and we will.

he also declared:iran has launched twice and we have intercepted hundreds of missiles in the largest ballistic missile attack in history. no country in the world would accept such an attack, not even israel, and we will respond to these attacks.

what's the meaning?

if you don’t retaliate, you are not israel!

according to the timing inferred by the outside world, the time for israel's retaliation cannot be ruled out as october 7.

because this is a very symbolic day. on this day a year ago, hamas attacked israel, which also kicked off this round of conflicts in the middle east.

i saw that the israeli military spokesperson also stated:the idf is preparing for a major attack and will respond to iran when and how it sees fit, updating public safety guidance if it occurs.

this statement is also very israeli.

taking into account iran's possible reaction and the upcoming october 7, the israeli military is on high alert.

if we talk about iran, israel remains somewhat cautious; when it comes to lebanon and gaza, israel has absolutely no scruples.

the israeli army has been bombing targets in lebanon indiscriminately for days. in addition to beirut, the capital of lebanon, the israeli air strike targets expanded to northern lebanon for the first time on october 5. the israeli air strike targeted the northern lebanese city of tripoli, allegedly killing a hamas head in lebanon.

of course, the biggest recent result of the israeli army is that according to information disclosed by the outside world, safieddin, the most likely successor of hezbollah’s top leader nasrallah, was also killed by the israeli army.

the leadership of hezbollah has basically been taken over by israel. moreover, if the news comes out about who may be nasrallah's successor, whoever is behind may be killed by israel.

the israeli army also launched a ground offensive in lebanon.

on the 5th, the israel defense forces released a scene of a tunnel in lebanon. in the long and narrow tunnel, there were still many weapons and supplies left by hezbollah.

obviously, the israeli army has invaded southern lebanon.

but hezbollah is not a benefactor either.

hezbollah also revealed that earlier on the 5th, they "directly" hit an israeli tank with a missile. the israeli troops in the tank were "either killed or wounded." the battle is still fierce.

in the first ground battle a few days ago, although the israeli army claimed to have killed many hezbollah militants, the israeli army was also ambushed by hezbollah. 8 israeli soldiers and officers were killed, and dozens of others were injured. evacuate the battlefield for rescue.

gaza and lebanon are already bleeding rivers, but this is the norm; the biggest question now is how israel will retaliate against iran.

after all, iran took action and recently launched about 200 missiles to attack israeli military and security targets. no country in the middle east has attacked israel like iran.

according to israel's vengeful style, revenge is inevitable.

there are roughly three targets for israel's retaliation.

first, iran’s military facilities;

second, iran’s oil facilities;

third, iran’s nuclear facilities.

the united states has made it clear that it does not want israel to attack the second and third targets.

just a few days ago, biden rarely attended a white house press conference and said: "if i were in their (israel's) position, i would consider other options besides attacking the oil fields."

however, the u.s. state department also revealed that israel has not yet assured the united states that it will not attack iran's nuclear facilities.

the biggest headache for the united states is that if israel ignores it, the situation will get out of control, and the united states will definitely be the one to clean up the mess in the end.

after all, iran is not vegetarian. iran's supreme leader ayatollah ali khamenei recently made a "rare" appearance at a public event to warn israel not to act rashly.

khamenei declared,iran's recent military actions against israel are the "minimum punishment" for israel. if necessary, iran will continue to carry out such actions in the future.

israel has attacked hamas on the left, hezbollah again, and now it is targeting iran. although there are reasons for the spread of war, why can't the united states control israel?

after all, the conflict in the middle east has seriously affected the democratic party's election. at least on the surface, the biden administration has also strongly called on israel to stop its hand, and even proposed a ceasefire in lebanon, but israel just dismissed it.

so much so that democratic senator chris murphy concluded,the fundamental problem with israel's aggressive actions is the us election.

murphy said this:“i think you don’t have to be a hopeless cynic to interpret some of israel’s actions, some of prime minister netanyahu’s actions, and the u.s. election.”

according to him, netanyahu's unwillingness to cease fire is deliberately snubbing the democratic party and supporting trump.

biden was actually very angry, so at the press conference, he also made it clear:"no (u.s.) administration has helped israel more than i have...i think bibi (netanyahu's nickname) should remember that. as for whether he tried to influence the election, i don't know, but i don’t count on that.”

biden also suspects that netanyahu is influencing the u.s. election by continuing to make aggressive moves.

well, i originally put my heart towards the bright moon, but the bright moon shines on the ditch.

interestingly, biden is very dissatisfied with netanyahu, but trump is particularly affectionate towards netanyahu.

trump publicly declared,biden's request for israel not to attack iran's nuclear facilities is "the craziest thing i have ever heard." israel should attack iran's nuclear facilities. "his answer should be 'strike nuclear first, and then worry about other problems.'"

i don’t know if these words spoke to netanyahu’s heart.

israel is furious and obviously will not stop.

in addition to the factors that affect the us election, there is another very important factor that i have seen mentioned by foreign media:in israel, netanyahu faces multiple criminal charges. if he stops the war, his government will soon collapse. he does not rule out being imprisoned; as long as he continues to fight, in this state of war, he will able to maintain power…

but fighting iran is very different from fighting hamas and hezbollah.

if an attack on iranian military facilities causes heavy losses, iran will definitely fight back.

iran will definitely not give up on attacking iran's oil facilities and will still fight back.

if iran attacks iran's nuclear facilities, it will be difficult to explain to the country if it does not violently fight back.

the biggest nightmare in the middle east is that peace is always too difficult and war is always too easy.

often a conflict is almost over, and just when all parties are about to breathe a sigh of relief, an unexpected incident triggers a prairie fire of anger. both sides retaliate - counter-retaliation - counter-retaliation, lava rushes out from the ground, and everything is irreversible. …

alas, the chinese enjoyed a peaceful national day holiday, but the world has undergone major changes.

a new bloody storm is coming.