news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

since the outbreak of the russian-ukrainian conflict, "russia will drop nuclear weapons if there is a disagreement" has been a fixed perception among many military fans and even ordinary people. the squid group deliberately took advantage of this perception, often operating a wave of cognitive warfare in the opposite direction, exporting views such as "russia dare not even drop nuclear weapons" and "russia's nuclear weapons are all fake" to create an atmosphere of russia's pill.

after the ukrainian army attacked kursk in august, this cognitive warfare routine reached its peak again. even ukraine was shouting through its loudspeakers, saying, "look, i have already attacked the russian mainland, but russia has not dropped any nuclear weapons, has it? russia's nuclear strategic tripwire does not exist, and russia's nuclear weapons strength is not reliable. please release the restrictions on engagement and let me attack the russian mainland!"

is this really the case? is russia's nuclear tripwire really a flexible bottom line? being attacked on its homeland will not trigger russia's flexible bottom line for using nuclear weapons. is russia's nuclear weapons really unreliable? let's sort out the development of russia's national nuclear strategy.