news

let’s make a simple guess: why were those two russian missiles that wiped out nato experts so accurate?

2024-09-09

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

at present, there is no consensus among all parties on the specific number of casualties of the ukrainian armed forces regarding the russian missile bombing of the 179th military communications training center base of the poltava military communications academy. the casualty data can be roughly divided into 600, 700 and 900 people.

as early as the 5th, a local resident of poltava posted a video saying that 760 bodies had been moved from the morgue by trucks. he called on "the ukrainian local government to tell the truth" and "760 bodies, but this is not the final number."

in fact, the russian army has used iskander to destroy the ukrainian army and even nato mercenary gathering places many times before, but this is perhaps the first time that nato's reaction has been so great.

what is even more unusual is that zelensky was in a panic and came out to speak about the poltava attack; a day later, ukrainian foreign minister kuleba took the initiative to resign (kuleba's handwriting is quite good, he even used handwritten form).

of course, on the day of kuleba's resignation, five other senior ukrainian cabinet officials announced their collective resignation, which is definitely inseparable from the complex power struggle within the ukrainian government.

however, as foreign minister, kuleba is the direct person in charge of ukraine's liaison with nato affairs. his work includes but is not limited to traveling between nato countries to ask for "assistance", coordinating specific assistance matters, and promoting ukraine's process of joining nato.

over the years, kuleba has often given foreign ministers or leaders of various countries an affectionate hug, and they seem to have a very good relationship.

this is with german foreign minister and vice chancellor bergböck.

this is with then british prime minister liz truss. they also hugged and looked at each other affectionately like a couple.

receive other nato dignitaries.

however, perhaps it was because of kuleba's "special relationship" with nato that after the poltava military communications academy was attacked, kuleba became one of the main scapegoats in the incident.

because this time the missiles did not severely damage the students (ukraine), but the teachers who taught tutoring classes in ukraine (nato experts and even active military personnel).

after all, although everyone is said to be equal, in reality, the sensation and pressure caused by the death of a nato military expert may be greater than the death of 1,000 ukrainians.

this time, it is speculated that the casualties include at least 37 early warning aircraft electronic warfare experts from sweden.

the entire swedish expert team sent to ukraine was most likely wiped out.

you know, there are probably no more than 200 airborne early warning system experts in all of sweden.

moreover, sweden has only been a member of nato for half a year, and it has been sacrificed like this...

so we saw that on the day that ukrainian foreign minister kuleba resigned, swedish foreign minister tobias billström also suddenly announced his resignation, voluntarily gave up his seat in parliament, and claimed that he would retire from politics from then on.

it is clear that billström is the de facto person in charge of sweden's nato affairs and the main contact person for foreign minister kuleba...

what is even more bizarre is that within 24 hours of the attack on the poltava military communications academy, us army lieutenant colonel joshua kamara was suddenly announced dead in a training camp in poland. the cause of death has not yet been made public.

please note that joshua kamara is not a foreign volunteer or mercenary, he is an active-duty us military personnel.

so, he had to "die in poland".

well, this is very confusing.

as a sensitive area where many "foreign experts" gather, why didn't the poltava military communications academy take adequate protective warnings?

what's more, it is currently being used as a professional base for training ukrainian military drone operations, early warning communications and electronic warfare personnel.

nato’s early warning experts ultimately predicted nothing, and actually “predicted” themselves to meet god in advance?

in fact, rather than saying that russia’s intelligence agencies are powerful, it is better to say that nato’s confidentiality is too low.

nato's level of confidentiality was verified earlier this year.

the german military leaders directly used civilian software to hold a military meeting. four senior german generals held a meeting for half an hour without stopping, but they didn't notice that there was an extra person in the meeting room!

russian intelligence officers not only eavesdropped on the meeting, they also deciphered the meeting recordings uploaded by the german bundeswehr to a network disk - because the password was a "typical weak password" that did not require any effort to decipher.

then, the recording of the meeting of these four senior nato officers appeared on the news program of russian state television.

okay, let’s talk about the ukrainian military academy that was hit by russian missiles.

for the relevant process, please refer to some details disclosed by the new york times and fox news.

on august 22, local officials in ukraine's poltava oblast released a graduation preview video of the military communications academy online, which included shots of various landmarks and proudly emphasized that among these people were nato experts in electronic warfare, early warning aircraft, and drones.

wow, netizens may have thought that russia’s intelligence capabilities were excellent and the kgb was still strong and powerful again... it turned out that ukraine took the initiative to disclose the information...

in the eyes of anyone with a little common sense of confidentiality, this is tantamount to directly passing intelligence to the enemy - the time, place, and people involved are all reported.

so many netizens suspected that this ukrainian official who sent out the graduation notice might be a "spy" planted by the russian army?

however, according to common sense, even if a spy is transmitting intelligence, he has to encode it and make it secretive and disguised. how could there be such an open and unconcealed method of "transferring intelligence"?

what is even more shocking is that this base, which has a large number of "foreign experts" stationed there and specializes in training electronic warfare, early warning personnel and drone operators, did not "warn" of any threat signals at all.

according to relevant reports, before the incident, a russian drone approached and observed. at that time, there were more than 500 people lined up for review on the parade ground of the school. in the building next to it, which is the "education building" mentioned by zelensky, a large number of instructors and students were taking classes.

the drone quickly passed the information to the russian rear headquarters. the russian army at a certain base immediately launched two iskander missiles at the coordinates displayed by the drone - one equipped with a cluster warhead and the other with a high-explosive warhead.

the cluster warhead missile exploded in the air on the parade ground, and the sprayed bomblets covered more than 500 ukrainian technical trainees and their instructors who were undergoing review; the high-explosive warhead accurately hit the "education building".

high-explosive warheads are used to blow up buildings, and cluster warheads are used for physical elimination in the open air. this happened to coincide with the time when instructors and trainees would gather on a large scale, so the arrangements were made clearly.

the two shots were just right, without any waste.

as for some people asking, why did they only use two iskander shells to hit such a good target?

some people also said that if it were israel, it would definitely kill the subsequent rescue medical team as well.

in fact, compared with israel and hamas, russia and ukraine are more martial and their main targets are military personnel from both sides.

moreover, whether it is willing to admit it or not, russia has always had illusions about the west deep down. therefore, it cannot do things too drastically.

in addition, it may also be due to cost issues, and the fear that too many missiles would expose the launcher's position, etc. therefore, two shots were just right.

what's more coincidental is that it happened to be the day when the ukrainian ambassador to japan was worshipping the dead, so it was an unintentional way for us to vent our anger.

at this point, everyone should have figured it out. the russian army's precise strike was actually inseparable from ukraine's "intelligence support."

what is even more embarrassing is the "foreign experts" and a group of ukrainian "disciples" who were invited in with great fanfare. what on earth did these professional and technical personnel engaged in electronic warfare and early warning aircraft "predict"?

this is an original article. any reproduction or adaptation without authorization is prohibited!