news

4 years, $32 million, approved by reeves! the lakers may have miscalculated as the nba's most vulnerable team

2024-09-01

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

after experiencing the failure of last season, many people thought that the lakers would upgrade their lineup in the offseason. after all, with james and davis, the lakers will definitely continue to challenge for the championship. but in fact, not only did the lakers fail to strengthen their lineup, but they also lost prince and dinwiddie in the offseason. although prince's help to the lakers was limited last season, prince is definitely a more reliable shooter for the lakers. in the regular season, prince averaged 1.8 three-pointers per game, and his three-point shooting percentage was as high as 39.6%. it can be said that prince is still very important to the lakers, especially considering that redick will pay more attention to the team's offense in the new season, so prince is still quite important to the lakers.

what people didn't expect was that the lakers didn't keep prince in the end. you know, prince only signed a minimum salary contract with the bucks, so the lakers' approach is even more puzzling. of course, in addition to letting go of prince and dinwiddie, what is most puzzling to lakers fans is that the lakers signed christie for 32 million us dollars for 4 years. you know, christie averaged only 4.2 points, 2.1 rebounds and 0.9 assists per game last season, and no team competed with the lakers in the offseason, but the lakers suddenly gave christie a big contract, which many people think is unreasonable. although christie is only 21 years old, just looking at last season, christie did not show enough convincing talent.