news

huang shanshan used taiwan province regulations to defend taipei jinghuacheng and was criticized for proving her guilt

2024-09-17

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

taiwan people's party chairman ko wen-je was involved in the jinghua city case. people's party representative huang shanshan emphasized that the ko government gave the volume bonus in accordance with article 25 of the "taipei city urban planning implementation autonomy regulations", while the people's party believed that it was in line with the "urban planning act taiwan province implementation rules". kuomintang taipei city councilor you shuhui refuted on the 16th that huang shanshan's move was equivalent to proving her own guilt, which meant that the city government took the initiative to give volume to jinghua city, and the taiwan province implementation rules did not apply to taipei city, which is a "special municipality".

you shuhui pointed out that jinghua city adopted the self-proposed plan in article 24 of the "urban planning act", that is, the content award plan and detailed plan were proposed by the industry itself, and the city government and the taipei city council only assisted in the review and approval. however, huang shanshan brought out article 25 of the "taipei city urban planning implementation autonomy regulations" to explain that it became the city government that took the initiative to give jinghua city a content award and help jinghua city modify its urban plan. huang's words helped jinghua city out of the predicament but harmed civil servants, which was tantamount to proving her own guilt.

you shuhui said that the people's party attempted to use article 34-2 of the "urban planning act taiwan province implementation rules" to help jinghua city out of the predicament, which states that "the capacity bonus for non-urban renewal is limited to 20% of the statutory capacity." however, the erroneous legal source they held was exactly the same as the statement issued by the weijing group on august 29. both parties spoke in unison, and it is not known whether this can be considered as collusion.

dpp taipei city councilor jian shupei also questioned that the people's party blindly supports ko wen-je and the entire party is willing to be legally ignorant. she said that jinghua city complies with the "taiwan province implementation rules of the urban planning act", but "special municipalities" are different from taiwan province. trying to apply taiwan province's implementation rules to taipei city will only make people laugh at the people's party for being uneducated.

lin jingxian, taiwan correspondent of strait herald