news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

taiwan people's party chairman ko wen-je was detained and denied access to visitors due to his involvement in the jinghua city scandal. on the 13th, the taiwan public opinion foundation released the latest poll on "taiwanese society's attitude towards the detention of people's party chairman ko wen-je". when asked whether ko wen-je was politically persecuted by lai ching-te's administration, 28.6% of people agreed. former legislator guo zhengliang said that the poll believed that 28.6% of people believed that ko wen-je was politically persecuted. this case really hurt lai ching-te, and in the end, lai ching-te would definitely be blamed.

guo zhengliang said that with the people's party's current support rate only around 15% to 16%, the fact that 28.6% of people believe that ko wen-je is being politically persecuted is noteworthy, as it represents society's doubts about the authorities' excessive manipulation of the judiciary.

guo zhengliang went on to say that the ko wen-je case was really hurtful to lai ching-te, and that the leaders of the taiwan region could not interfere in the judiciary, but the attorney general xing taizhao and the chief prosecutor of the northern district prosecutors office wang junli should both speak out, and the heads of the legal departments should also come out to exercise some restraint, because in the end these would definitely be blamed on lai ching-te.

guo zhengliang pointed out that if ko wen-je really cannot find the money flow, if he wants to extend his detention just for profit after two months, the political impact will be huge. because the public will wonder what you are doing. the reason for the detention is directly written as "taking bribes in violation of official duties", but nothing has been found so far.

guo zhengliang also pointed out that ko wen-je also went against the taipei prosecutors' office. the lawyer did not appeal and cooperated with the investigation for two months to see how much money flow you can find out. if the two months are up and the taipei prosecutors' office has relevant evidence to consolidate the decision, ko wen-je will definitely have another explanation. we can discuss it in detail at that time.

lin jingxian, taiwan correspondent of strait herald