news

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

former taipei mayor ko wen-je was involved in the jinghua city plot ratio scandal. the prosecutor requested that he be detained and not allowed to see anyone. the taipei district court (hereinafter referred to as "taipei district court") ruled that he should be released without bail. the prosecutor successfully appealed and the taiwan high court revoked the original ruling and sent it back for retrial. on the 5th, the taipei district court ruled that ko wen-je should be detained and not allowed to see anyone. former legislative yuan member guo zhengliang said that the first trial debate was ko wen-je's opportunity to make his entire feelings about this matter clear to all taiwanese compatriots.

guo zhengliang said on the 5th that the people's party will continue to engage in political offense and defense, because the law will not be able to be used for offense and defense, and this case will end here. the people's party will definitely confront taiwan's public opinion institutions, the taiwan judicial system, and the media. of course, the relevant units will raise the personnel of the "grand justice", including the taiwan judicial institutions and the "ncc". according to his understanding, they will also focus on the "judicial committee" for questioning, but it is unclear whether it will be linked to the kuomintang.

guo zhengliang pointed out that it is worth observing how the people's party will restart after ko wen-je's detention. the people's party must deal with the power structure of the central committee of the people's party. the central evaluation committee of the people's party may have to deal with it according to the party constitution, and the central committee members of the people's party must elect an acting chairman.

guo zhengliang pointed out that you yinglong, chairman of the taiwan public opinion foundation, mentioned that ko wen-je was preparing for the first-instance debate. the first-instance debate is open to the entire society. it is his opportunity. ko wen-je can make his entire feeling about this matter clear to all taiwanese compatriots. the people's party will definitely understand it as judicial persecution. as for how to position itself in the future? for example, can taiwan's "judicial reform" find new impetus from here?

in response to ko wen-je's detention and no visitation, "little grass" (young supporters of the people's party) could not hide their disappointment. on the 5th, the people's party applied for a rally near xiaonanmen in taipei city. on the evening of the 4th, the taipei city police fenced off an "opinion expression area" for the "little grass" to gather and show support, and controlled entry and exit around the taipei district prosecutors office. on the 5th, the number of little grass who arrived was only more than 10 people at most. scattered supporters held up banners and shouted "judicial injustice" to support ko wen-je.

after ko wen-je was confirmed to be detained in the evening, his supporters in the south collapsed upon hearing the news, shouting in the line group to take to the streets. the tainan city party committee held an emergency meeting, and chairman lin naili relayed the instructions of the people's party secretary-general zhou yuxiu, saying that local party officials should stay at their jobs and not be affected, and called on supporters to stay put and maintain normal life. however, some "little grass" shouted to go north to protest on the weekend, and some people were disappointed and wanted to quit following him.

in response, former people's party legislator tsai bi-ru said that she has always believed in mayor ko's innocence based on what she has seen of ko during her 30 years of working with him. detention and no contact with him is not a finding of guilt, and she still hopes that mayor ko will be safe. people's party legislator huang shanshan said that she regrets the court's decision and will support chairman ko in continuing to defend his innocence in accordance with the law.