news

did ke wenzhe's subordinates forcibly interfere with the review of the taipei dome? taipei political affairs office: it did not constitute profiteering

2024-09-05

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the people's party chairman ko wen-je has recently attracted attention for his political donations for the 2024 taiwan regional leader election. li wen-tsung, who was then the chief financial officer of ko wen-je's campaign, was also interviewed by the prosecutors and was ordered to pay a bail of nt$2 million (the same below). however, lin zhoumin, former director of the taipei city department of urban development, revealed on the 4th that in 2018, li wen-tsung, then director of ko wen-je's office, forcibly interfered with the review of the taipei "big dome" case, demanded the change of meeting records, and yelled at him and asked him to resign, suspected of seeking benefits. in response, the taipei political affairs office said that the case had been interviewed at the time and believed that li wen-tsung did not constitute the crime of "seeking benefits."

lin zhoumin said that in 2018, li wenzong was the director of mayor ko wen-je's office, and he personally believed that li wenzong was not qualified to interfere with the urban development bureau's review of the "big dome" case. however, during many urban design reviews of the "big dome", li wenzong represented the mayor in the urban review meeting to "supervise the entire process" and even requested to change the "urban review meeting minutes."

lin zhoumin said that li wenzong's forceful and malicious interference seriously violated taiwan's civil service system, which can be summed up in two words: "hateful." he was asked to change the meeting minutes. "of course i didn't change it! i don't have to change it, and i can't change it. at that time, my colleagues, including two deputy directors, civil servants from the construction management office, assisted me in handling the taipei dome business for a long time. they also disagreed with li wenzong's forceful and malicious interference. i have no evidence to prove my words now, but the political affairs office has my written statement in april 2019."

lin zhoumin further revealed that when ko wen-je was confirmed to be re-elected at the end of 2018, li wen-chung also asked him to resign from the post of director of the urban development bureau, and even asked him to resign on the grounds of poor implementation of public housing, too strict audit of the "taipei dome" on farglory, and leaking the figures of public housing construction by the urban development bureau to his opponent ting shou-chung. however, he refuted his rebuttal one by one.

in response to lin zhoumin's statement, the taipei city government affairs office said today that after interviewing the case, it was believed that li wenzong did not constitute a "crime of seeking benefits". the government affairs office said that this case was questioned by taipei city councilor jian shupei and former councilor liang wenjie in april 2019, and believed that li wenzong's actions might involve "seeking benefits". after the government affairs office interviewed some of the people in charge at the time and reviewed the materials for analysis, it was found that li wenzong's actions did not specifically violate the "law" or allow farglory company to obtain any substantial future benefits.(lin jingxian, strait herald reporter in taiwan)