news

The United States and this country both sent troops without the consent of the United Nations. Their fates are completely different.

2024-08-08

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

“This article has been copyright certified through blockchain technology. Any form of adaptation, reprinting or plagiarism is prohibited. Violators will be held accountable.”

After the World War, the people of the whole society learned from the painful experience. So after the establishment of the United Nations in 1945, the new international order gradually improved, and the world pattern developed in a peaceful direction, with only local disputes. After all, "where there are people, there are rivers and lakes." As we all know, initiating a war requires the consent of the United Nations. What will happen if it is not approved?

There have been countries that have tested the law. One typical example is the Iraq War. The United States used the excuse that "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" to send troops to Iraq without the consent of the United Nations, making Iraq a mess, overthrowing Saddam's rule, and hanging him alive. The Iraqi people are still living in dire straits. We should take this as a warning, but we will not discuss it here. The purpose of the United States sending troops is to dominate the Middle East, maintain the hegemony of the US dollar, and continue to fleece the people of the world, but it also established itself as the "embodiment of justice", and the Western countries that are in the same boat with it also promote it in the same way. The United Nations also "turned a blind eye" to this war.